Powered by cowie.ai β’ Quick troubleshooting for production alarms
No cause information available
Trouble has occurred in the hardware.
The emergency stop button on the operating panel has been pressed.
Data error on the memory.
The contents of the system software and/or custom software have been destroyed.
No cause information available
The S-RAM mounted on the CPU card has become abnormal.
The RAM mounted on the CPU card has become abnormal.
The absolute position detection system has lost absolute position data.
The absolute position detection system has detected its detector error(s).
The absolute position detection system has detected an error(s) by cross-checking the absolute position of its detector and the internal coordinate data of the NC unit.
The battery for retaining absolute position data is running low with a voltage drop, or has exhausted. * Depending on the machine, the message ABSOLUTE POSITION WARNING may be displayed in red.
The software is not correctly working.
Software of this system has become abnormal.
Amplifier power is not yet turned on. Or no signals are transferred yet.
No cause information available
No cause information available
There occurred an alarm in the safe operation system.
Trouble has occurred for the spindle in the mode of safety-speed operation.
A power supply alarm has occurred.
The servo (power-off level) is abnormal. The inertia on the servo axis is excessive.
The parameters that have been transferred from the NC unit to the servo amplifier during NC power-on are not correct.
The servo (NC reset level) is abnormal. The inertia on the servo axis is excessive.
The servo (amplifier power-off level) is abnormal. The inertia on the servo axis is excessive.
An extraordinary overload has been detected.
The spindle (power-off level) is abnormal. The inertia on the spindle is excessive.
The parameters that have been transferred from the NC unit to the spindle amplifier during NC power-on are not correct.
The spindle (NC reset level) is abnormal. The inertia on the spindle is excessive.
The spindle (amplifier power-off level) is abnormal. The inertia on the spindle is excessive.
Parameters cannot be correctly written into the E2ROM.
The battery provided to retain parameters, machining programs and other types of data within the NC unit has reached the minimum voltage level permissible or has run down.
The temperature of the control unit or operation board has increased above the required level. Note : 1. Location of the temperature alarm 2. Type of temperature alarm 3. On-alarm temperature value
No cause information available
No cause information available
The ROMs mounted in the system ROM card are currently being checked for abnormalities.
The user PLC is not stored in the NC unit.
Trouble has occurred with the PLC.
The PLC has ceased running.
Disconnection or CRC error occurred during remote I/O 2.0 communication.
An error occurred during remote I/O initialization processing. No. Cause 0 Γ 01 RIO2.0 control register does not βstopβ although RIO2.0 stop was requested. 0 Γ 02 Cyclic transfer counter is not operating. 0 Γ 04 In RIO2.0 communication, connection status cannot be obtained. 0 Γ 08 RIO1.0 communication was conducted using a station number (9 or larger) which is outside the RIO1.0 communication range. 0 Γ 10 A unit for RIO1.0 communication is connected to the No. 3 system. 0 Γ 20 Units of more than 17 stations were connected to the No. 3 system. 0 Γ 40 A safety RIO unit and a unit for RIO1.0 communication are connected to the same system. 0 Γ 80 The received data of a safety RIO is not updated. 0 Γ 100 Time-out in obtaining the RIO1.0 communication enabled station information while RIO2.0 communication setting is made.
An error occurred during remote I/O initialization processing. No. Cause 1 A value outside the allowable range is set for a system number or a station number. 2 Overlapped system number or station number 3 A value outside the allowable range is set for a device setting value. 4 An illegal value is set for a device setting value. 5 The same device is set for multiple stations.
The setting of a parameter is invalid. No. Cause 1 A value outside the allowable range is set for a system number or a station number. 2 Overlapped system number or station number 3 A value outside the allowable range is set for a device setting value. 4 An illegal value is set for a device setting value. 5 The same device is set for multiple stations. 6 Parameter check is executed for arbitrary allocation parameters although the setting is for fixed allocation.
The number of set high-speed inputs/outputs exceeds the upper limit.
Hardware overvoltage was detected at the control unit.
No cause information available
A servo with a system not applicable to high-speed synchronous tapping is connected in spite of the high-speed synchronous tapping option being valid.
A servo with a system not applicable to high-speed synchronous tapping is connected in spite of the high-speed synchronous tapping option being valid.
No cause information available
No cause information available
No cause information available
The servomotor is loaded abnormally. The inertia has become excessive.
No cause information available
The inertia on the spindle has become excessive.
The combination of the hardware and the installed software is not correct.
No cause information available
Some mistake in operations during the automatic operation has caused the tool tip to overstep the area specified in the software limit parameters in the direction of the axis corresponding to the displayed axis name.
The tool tip has reached stroke limit in the direction of the axis corresponding to the displayed axis name.
The spindle speed acceleration was clamped while the spindle speed fluctuation function was enabled.
An attempt was made to use the spindle speed fluctuation function although the relevant option was not featured.
Alarm No. | Cause --- | --- &0000 0001 | When specifying the M code for enabling the spindle speed fluctuation synchronous mode, a spindle that was already in the spindle speed fluctuation synchronous mode in another control path was specified. &0000 0002 | When specifying the M code for enabling the spindle speed fluctuation synchronous mode, the specified spindle or NC axis did not exist. &0000 0004 | When specifying the M code for enabling the spindle speed fluctuation, a spindle whose spindle speed fluctuation was already enabled in another control path was specified. &0000 0008 | When specifying the M code for enabling the spindle speed fluctuation, the specified spindle or NC axis did not exist. &0000 0010 | The spindle whose spindle speed fluctuation is enabled does not match the spindle encoder number or the spindle specified for the constant surface speed control.
Alarm No. | Cause --- | --- &0000 0001 | A spindle speed fluctuation mode enabling M code was specified while override variable thread cutting was enabled. An override variable thread cutting enabling M code was specified while the spindle speed fluctuation was enabled. &0000 0002 | A spindle speed fluctuation enabling M code was specified in the G61.1 mode. G61.1 was specified while spindle speed fluctuation was enabled. &0000 0004 | A spindle speed fluctuation enabling M code was specified in the polygon machining mode. A polygon machining mode command was specified while spindle speed fluctuation was enabled. &0000 0008 | A spindle speed fluctuation enabling M code was specified in the hobbing mode. A hobbing mode command was specified while spindle speed fluctuation was enabled. &0000 0020 | A spindle speed fluctuation enabling M code was specified during synchronized tapping. A synchronized tapping command was specified while spindle speed fluctuation was enabled. The master spindle in synchronous operation was specified as the spindle for spindle speed fluctuation. &0000 0040 | A spindle for which spindle speed fluctuation was enabled was specified as the master spindle for synchronous operation. The slave spindle in synchronous operation was specified as the spindle for spindle speed fluctuation. &0000 0080 | A spindle for which spindle speed fluctuation was enabled was specified as the slave spindle for synchronous operation. The master axis in the simplified synchronous mode was specified as the servo axis for spindle speed fluctuation. &0000 0100 | A servo axis for which spindle speed fluctuation was enabled was specified as the master axis in the simplified synchronous mode. &0000 0200 | The slave axis in the simplified synchronous mode was specified as the servo axis for spindle speed fluctuation. A servo axis for which spindle speed fluctuation was enabled was specified as the slave axis in the simplified synchronous mode.
During reference-point return, the proximity-point detection limit switch has overrun the position in which the watchdog is mounted.
During initial reference-point return following the power-on action, an axis has not passed through the Z phase of the corresponding detector.
The axis-movement direction selected with the axis selector switch is not correct for the reference-point return in manual operation mode.
An axis is interlocked because the interlock function has become active (input signal has turned off).
The very direction in which the manual skip function has become effective is specified in the axis-movement command. Or the servo-off function is active.
Incorrect mode selection or malfunction of the automatic operation key.
The cutting-feed override value is set to 0 on the machine operating panel.
β’ An attempt has been made to execute an axis movement in the cutting feed mode or dry-run in the automatic operation mode, with the manual feedrate remaining set to 0 on the machine operating panel. β’ After a restart search, the cycle start button was pressed with the manual feedrate set to 0.
Spindle rotation did not start when the spindle rotation start command was issued during automatic operation.
The spindle-speed limit has been exceeded.
The interlock signal to lock the start of the program block has been input.
The interlock signal to lock the start of the cutting program block has been input.
Dynamic compensation amount exceeded 3 mm (0.12 in).
1. An interruption occurred during rotation of the indexing (rotary) table. 2. A 3D coordinate conversion command (G68/G69) was specified while G0 was temporarily canceled in tool tip point control during machining of an inclined plane or workpiece placement error correction.
An abnormality has occurred in the NC unit during the pre-interpolation acceleration/deceleration process.
Returning to the second reference point has been commanded in spite of the fact that returning to the first reference point has not yet occurred.
The synchronization error between the master axis and the slave axis during synchronous control has overstepped a predetermined allowable value.
An operation mode has not been selected, or more than one operation mode have been selected. The automatic operation key is malfunctioning.
A nonexistent axis has been designated as the handle feed axis. Or a handle feed axis has not been designated.
It was attempted to start automatic operation under the following conditions: Alarm No. | Cause --- | --- 0 Γ 101 | The smoothing level is not zero. 0 Γ 102 | NC ready signal is not ON. 0 Γ 103 | Reset state not yet cleared. 0 Γ 104 | Feed hold is in operation. 0 Γ 105 | Hardware overtravel not yet cleared. 0 Γ 106 | Software overtravel not yet cleared. 0 Γ 107 | No operation mode selected. 0 Γ 108 | Two or more operation modes selected. 0 Γ 109 | During change in operation modes. 0 Γ 110 | During editing on the EIA MONITOR display. 0 Γ 111 | During search on the tape data. 0 Γ 113 | Abnormality in temperature. 0 Γ 114 | Program being edited on the EIA MONITOR display 0 Γ 115 | A door opened. 0 Γ 116 | During compensation in tandem control. 0 Γ 117 | An alarm related to polygonal machining or hob milling not yet cleared. 0 Γ 118 | An alarm related to safety barrier not yet cleared. 0 Γ 120 | After establishing absolute positions through zero return operation, the power has not been turned off and back on.
The absolute position data has become lost. Trouble has occurred in the absolute position detector.
Automatic operation has been started in a mode other than automatic operation.
1. The rotational angle limit at the shaping block connections has been exceeded. 2. The radius of the arc is less than the rotational radius of the C-axis.
1. The tool entered in the chuck barrier. Note : 1. Interfering component 1 Display | No. 1 spindle chuck --- | --- 1 | No. 1 spindle chuck 2 | No. 2 spindle chuck 4 | Tailstock 8 | Turret 2. Interfering component 2 Display | Type A | Type B | Type C --- | --- | --- | --- 0 | Tool tip | Turret | Tool, holder, turret 1 | Turret | Holder | β 2 | β | Tool | β Machine type A, B and C above are available according to the settings of the following parameters: Type | BA73 | BA129 bit 1 --- | --- | --- A | Other than 0 | 0 B | β | 1 C | 0 | 0 2. Interference is occurring between the tool and chuck in the solid mode.
1. The tool entered in the tail barrier. Note : For details of the cause, refer to Note 2 βInterfering component 2β in the explanation of alarm 148 CHUCK BARRIER. 2. Interference is occurring between the tool and tailstock in the solid mode.
1. Interference is occurring between the workpiece of the No. 1 turning spindle side and the workpiece of the No. 2 turning spindle side. 2. Interference is occurring between the tool and workpiece in the solid mode.
Executing the tandem driving function has been attempted despite a tandem driving option not being present.
1. The settings of the address name parameters (M11) on each axis are illegal. 2. An attempt has been made to simultaneously control axes other than the master axis that has been set in a parameter.
1. The axis reached its pressing completion position before a skipping signal was generated. 2. The drooping amount during pressing operation cannot overstep the setting in parameter K46.
Zero-point return mode has been selected during three-dimensional coordinate conversion.
The barriers of the upper and lower turrets interferes with each other. Note : For details of the cause, refer to Note 2 "Interfering component 2" in the explanation of alarm 148 CHUCK BARRIER.
The measuring sensor has turned on at a position in a non-measuring area.
Measurement results are not normal.
It was attempted to manually control an axis currently under the control for cross machining.
Alarm No. | Cause --- | --- &0000 0001 | The specified axis does not exist in the counterpart system. &0000 0002 | The self-system is specified as the system to be cross-controlled. &0000 0004 | The cross machining control is specified for an axis which is already under the control in question. &0000 0010 | A command for cross machining control is given from the counterpart system. &0000 0040 | In the mode of inclined-axis control a cross-control command is given for the fundamental axis (X-axis) without positioning of the inclined axis (Y-axis) in its zero point. In the mode of inclined-axis control a cross-control command is given for the inclined axis (Y-axis). A cross control command or cross control cancel command was specified for the NC axis in the spindle speed fluctuation synchronous mode. &0000 0080 | A cross control command or cross control cancel command was specified for an NC axis for which spindle speed fluctuation is enabled. &0000 0400 | At the execution of a cross-machining command, the axis movement completion wait time exceeded the time set at parameter SU54.
The number of axes in the remote system has become zero as a result of crossing command execution.
It was attempted to start superposition control with an unavailable axis. It was attempted to start superposition control under incompatible modal conditions.
Incorrect parameter settings do not allow the superposition control to be started.
There is a danger that one workpiece will interfere with the other. There is a danger that the partition plate will interfere with the workpiece or the lower turret.
With the machine under the control for safety speed, a command for the following was given: Threading, Synchronous tapping, Cross machining, Superposition control.
The command signal for the control for safety speed was turned on in the following modes of machining: Threading, Synchronous tapping, Cross machining, Superposition control.
An M810 command was given from one HD side to operate the lower turret that was currently used on the other HD side.
An attempt was made in the mode of tool tip point control to perform such an improper operation as follows: 1. Manual interruption 2. Interruption using the manual pulse handle 3. MDI interruption
An attempt was made in the mode of tool radius compensation for five-axis machining to perform such an improper operation as follows: 1. Manual interruption 2. Interruption using the manual pulse handle 3. MDI interruption
In the mode of high-speed smoothing control an unavailable operation (e. g. manual interruption) was attempted.
W-axis thrust has not been obtained.
W-axis operation was programmed during the application of the W-axis thrust.
The head (B) axis is used without the B-axis control option.
The No. 2 spindle/C-axis is used without the No. 2 spindle/C-axis option.
The No. 2 spindle/C-axis is used without the No. 2 spindle high-precision indexing option.
Vibration detection is used without the rotary table vibration detection option.
Changing the cutting feed time constant in the system has been attempted during synchronous tapping, threading, or control axis superposition.
The inertia estimation has been attempted by G297 during movement of the axis whose inertia was to be estimated. The G298 parameter setup command has been set during movement of the parameter setup reference axis or of some axis assigned to the parameter data development system. The G298 parameter setup command has been set during cutting feed time constant changeover or control axis superposition. The G298 parameter setup command has been set during axis rotation.
The estimated inertia has exceeded the maximum inertia specified in the TSVC parameter or the TSPC parameter.
Resonance has not been reduced during inertia estimation. The minimum inertial is not specified in TSVC or TSPC. The inertia estimation itself has failed.
An orienting command has been entered during synchronous tapping.
Although operation has been started in MDI mode, data has been found to be missing.
The axis removal request signal has been turned on when the axis removal-in-progress signal was on (after turning off the axis removal request signal, the operator has turned the axis removal request signal back on without waiting for the axis removal-in-progress signal to turn off). After the axis removal request signal was turned on for the absolute position control axis, the axis removal request signal has been turned off during display of alarm 71 ILLEGAL SERVO PARAMETER.
MDI interruption has been attempted during automatic operation.
An attempt was made in the mode of workpiece placement error correction to perform such an improper operation as follows: 1. Manual interruption 2. Interruption using the manual pulse handle 3. MDI interruption
An attempt was made in the mode of inclined-surface machining to perform such an improper operation as follows: 1. Manual interruption 2. Interruption using the manual pulse handle 3. MDI interruption
The amount of compensation for workpiece thermal expansion exceeded the effective range of +0.5 to β0.5 mm.
The workpiece thermal expansion compensation command is issued to a tool for which tool data is not entered.
Although the reference point for workpiece thermal expansion compensation was not set, the workpiece thermal expansion compensation command was issued.
The directions of rotation of the turning tool selected in the manual program unit and the spindle do not match.
An internal error(s) has occurred during program data change by the function of VFC, MMS etc.
1. A measurement operation was attempted although there is no FRM unit. 2. Coordinate measurement was executed from the FRM unit set as the center of table rotation. 3. Measurement of a tool other than a milling tool was attempted with laser measurement. 4. Offsetting of a tool other than a turning tool was attempted using measurement of O.D., I.D, single-side O.D., or single-side I.D. in a workpiece measurement unit. 5. Offsetting other than tool radius offset was attempted for a milling tool using measurement of groove width, protrusion width, I.D. protrusion width, or I.D. groove width in a workpiece measurement unit. 6. The barrier teaching function was activated while running a program stored outside the memory operation range or while there was an active barrier alarm during MDI operation. 7. An axis command for the driven axis was specified with the axis set in the synchronized operation mode. 8. The override variable thread cutting function was activated while position data is memorized using the rethreading function. 9. A winding that does not support the override variable thread cutting function is selected.
Tool data that correspond to the pocket numbers being displayed in the "TNo." item of the POSITION display are unregistered.
An internal error(s) has occurred when surface speed or feedrate changing by VFC function was under way.
During the second or subsequent rounds of manual measurement, an attempt has been made to perform skipping in a direction not available for measurement.
During the second or subsequent rounds of manual measurement, an attempt has been made to measure an illegal point.
Head data of the head number being used during MMS, MDI MMS or manual measurement does not exist.
Head data of the head number being used during MMS, MDI MMS or manual measurement is partly missing.
An attempt has been made to carry out divisions by zero inside the NC unit during measurement of the degree-of-straightness on the MEASURE display.
1. The pressure in the hydraulic system has dropped. 2. The electromagnetic switch thermal relay for the hydraulic pump motor has tripped.
Something is wrong with the hydraulic chiller unit.
The pressure in the pneumatic system has dropped.
The pressure in the milling spindle oil/air lubrication pump system has decreased.
The liquid level in the tank for milling spindle oil/air lubrication system has decreased.
The milling spindle oil/air pressure has decreased.
The pressure in the ball screw lubricating pump system has dropped.
The oil level in the ball screw lubricating oil tank is very low.
The alarm for the magazine rotating servo driver was raised.
An attempt was made to specify a tool name that does not match the unit for the tool name of a tool sequence while creating a machining program.
The tool unclamp mode has been established by pressing the tool unclamp button.
Any of the following breakers has tripped. (Clogging of filter or nozzle) QF211, QF213, QF2113, QF233, QF276 For breaker QF***, refer to the electric circuit diagram.
The power transformer was overheated because cutting was performed for a long time under heavy load. (The thermal switch was triggered.)
The load on the spindle cannot be reduced, even though the feed override was reduced using the AFC function.
The number of a tool that cannot be measured was specified in the automatic tool length measurement mode.
The tool has been used for a period of time longer than its useful life.
A broken tool was detected.
M codes that cannot be handled simultaneously have been specified at the same time. (Ex.: Simultaneous entry of M3 and M4.)
An M-code unsupported by the machine was entered.
The cycle start button was pressed on the VIRTUAL MACHINING screen when the SAFETY SHIELD function was effective for automatic operation.
Something is wrong with the workpiece measuring amplifier.
The external controller has detected an alarm.
1. The front door did not lock upon executing a cycle start command with the front door unlocked. 2. The front door does not unlock although the unlocking solenoid valve of the door lock switch is ON.
The manual interruption key on the magazine operating panel is enabled.
The magazine door is open.
ATC operation has been stopped by selecting [ATC STOP].
When restarting the operation, the cycle start button was pressed before completing the necessary operations.
The orientation of the milling spindle was not completed within 30 seconds after the issue of a milling spindle orient command.
A laser measuring unit error has occurred in the laser tool length measuring system.
The milling spindle tool clamping sensor has not turned on within 5 seconds after the issue of a milling spindle tool clamp command.
The milling spindle tool unclamping sensor has not turned on within 5 seconds after the issue of a milling spindle tool unclamp command.
The ATC cover open status sensor has not turned on within 10 seconds after the issue of an ATC cover open command.
The ATC cover close status sensor has not turned on within 10 seconds after the issue of an ATC cover close command.
The high-speed gear of the turning spindle is faulty. 1. The high-speed gear check sensor does not turn ON when the high-speed gear select command is executed. 2. The high-speed gear check sensor turned OFF in the high-speed gear selected state.
The low-speed gear of the turning spindle is faulty. 1. The low-speed gear check sensor does not turn ON when the low-speed gear select command is executed. 2. The low-speed gear check sensor turned OFF in the low-speed gear selected state.
The neutral gear of the turning spindle is faulty. 1. The neutral gear check sensor does not turn ON when the neutral gear select command is executed. 2. The neutral gear check sensor turned OFF in the neutral gear selected state.
Starting an automatic operation was attempted before completing the X-axis zero return operation.
Starting an automatic operation was attempted before completing the Y-axis zero return operation.
Starting an automatic operation was attempted before completing the Z-axis zero return operation.
A milling spindle start command was specified while no tool was clamped in the milling spindle.
A milling spindle start command was specified while the ATC arm was not at the reference position.
The special mode is selected on the manual pulse generator operating panel. 1. Cause code 1: All bits of RB90 are set to 1 (Mode for setting the operating panel in the unused state to connect the safety circuit). 2. Cause code 16: RB89 bit 3 is ON (pairing in progress). 3. Cause code 256: Another mode is selected.
An alarm is output from the manual pulse generator operating panel. 1. Cause code 16: The batteries for the manual pulse generator operating panel are running low. 2. Cause code 256: The manual pulse generator operating panel may be left unattended. 3. Cause code 4096: Communication between the manual pulse generator operating panel holder and the machine has failed.
When the tool on the milling spindle was unclamped, a milling spindle orient command was entered.
When the ATC arm was not in its reference position, a milling spindle orient command was entered.
When the milling spindle was rotating, a tool unclamp command was entered.
A tool unclamp command was specified while the milling spindle was not oriented.
The tool unclamp button on the machine operating panel was pressed in other than the manual operation mode.
One of the following tool shifter manual operations has been attempted when the tool carrier was not positioned at the tool shifter side. β’ Tool shifter movement toward the tool carrier β’ Tool shifter movement to the tool carrier standby position
When a magazine pocket containing a tool was indexed, a command for moving the tool shifter to the magazine position was entered.
1. The tool shifter was manually operated while the tool carrier was not at the tool shift side position. 2. The tool shifter was manually operated during magazine operation. 3. The tool shifter was manually operated during tool carrier operation.
A negative number was specified as a T-code.
1. An attempt was made to manually operate the ATC arm when the tool carrier was not at the ATC side position. 2. The ATC arm was manually operated during tool carrier operation. 3. The magazine was rotated while the tool shifter was at the magazine side position.
A turning spindle start command was specified while the turning spindle gear was at the neutral position.
A turning spindle orientation command was specified while the turning spindle gear was at the neutral position.
A circuit breaker in the control panel has tripped.
Something is wrong with the hydraulic chiller unit.
The thermal relays in the coolant unit of a machine of the high-pressure coolant specifications have tripped.
A turning spindle start command was specified under one of the following conditions. 1. The spindle chuck was not closed. 2. The milling spindle end clamp unit was not clamped. 3. The tailstock sleeve was not at the extend end or retract end position. (Neutral state) 4. The steady rest mechanism was not at the close end or open end position. (Neutral state) 5. The type of chucking (internal/external) of was not selected. 6. The front door was open with the machine setup switch set at the β0β (OFF) position.
A milling spindle start command was specified under one of the following conditions. 1. The spindle chuck was not closed. 2. The milling spindle end clamp unit was not unclamped. 3. The tailstock sleeve was not at the extend end or retract end position. (Neutral state) 4. The steady rest mechanism was not at the close end or open end position. (Neutral state) 5. The type of chucking (internal/external) of was not selected. 6. The front door was open with the machine setup switch set at the β0β (OFF) position. 7. The tool was not clamped. 8. The ATC arm was not at the reference position.
The orientation of the turning spindle was not completed within 10 seconds after the issue of a turning spindle orient command.
Mis-chucking has been detected under the specifications of the machine provided with chuck open/close confirmation sensors.
The chuck did not close within the time set with the alarm timer.
Something is wrong with the foot switch for opening/closing the spindle chuck.
When a selection between internal and external chucking was not made for the spindle chuck: 1. A spindle start command was entered or 2. Automatic operation was started.
Both the open end sensor and the close end sensor were turned on simultaneously on a machine equipped with chuck open/close confirmation sensors.
A chuck pressure drop was detected on a machine equipped with the spindle chuck pressure monitoring function.
When the milling spindle and the turning spindle were still rotating, the chucking mode between internal and external chucking was switched.
The connection of the C-axis was not completed within 30 seconds after the issue of a C-axis connect command.
C-axis position detection sensor is faulty.
The clamp and unclamp confirmation of the B-axis clamping mechanism do not work normally.
An axis movement key was pressed under one of the following conditions. 1. The milling spindle was not at a stop. 2. The turning spindle was not at a stop. 3. The ATC cover was open and the milling spindle was inside the ATC cover with the Z-axis advanced.
A TOOL EYE extend command was specified under one of the following conditions. 1. The milling spindle was not at a stop. 2. The turning spindle was not at a stop.
Measurement using the TOOL EYE was attempted in the manual intervention mode.
It cannot be confirmed whether the TOOL EYE unit operates normally. 1. The TOOL EYE forward end sensor does not work normally. 2. The TOOL EYE backward end sensor does not work normally.
The tailstock sleeve operation did not complete within the preset time.
Both the automatic door open/close end sensors are ON simultaneously.
The automatic front door (optional) did not fully open or close.
1. An axis movement key was pressed while the ATC cover was open and the milling spindle was inside the ATC cover with the Z-axis advanced. 2. The front door was opened with the machine setup switch set at the β0β (OFF) position.
The ATC-related mechanism is operating in an area at the machine rear that cannot be seen from the front. (When bit 0 of PLC parameter RB3 is set to β0β.)
An attempt to change operation modes was made: 1. At the start of automatic operation 2. When ATC mechanism was in operation.
The operation of the ATC cover is not completed within 30 seconds.
The alarm for the ATC arm servo driver was raised.
The alarm for the tool shifter servo driver was raised.
The alarm for the tool carrier servo driver was raised.
Rapid feed mode was selected before all axes returned to their respective zero points after the power was turned on.
Automatic operation mode was selected before all axes returned to their respective zero points after the power was turned on.
Automatic operation was started with the front door left open.
Automatic operation has been started with the ATC cover open.
Automatic operation was started with the magazine door left open.
Automatic operation was started with tools unclamped.
Automatic operation was started with the TOOL EYE unit left out.
Automatic operation was started when the spindle chuck was not fully closed.
Start of an automatic operation was attempted with the tailstock sleeve in the neutral status, on a tailstock specification machine.
Automatic operation was started when the ATC arm was not in its reference position.
1. When the carrier has a standby tool: The cycle start command was issued when the carrier was not at the ATC side or the shifter was not at the carrier-side standby position. 2. When the carrier has no standby tool: The cycle start command was issued when the carrier was not at the shifter side or the shifter was not at the magazine-side standby position.
Clogging of the super flow filter has been detected.
1. A menu item that incorporates ATC arm operation was selected while the ATC cover was not open. 2. Either [ATC ARM SWING] or [ATC ARM TURN] in the machine menu was selected (blue) while the milling spindle had not been orientated. 3. Either [ATC ARM BASE POSITION] or [ATC ARM SWING] in the machine menu was selected (blue) without clamping a tool. 4. [ATC ARM TURN] in the machine menu was selected (blue) without unclamping the tool.
The orient angle was changed by manual intervention, and the cycle start button was pressed without returning the orient angle to its original angle (for FLASH tool, etc.).
Automatic operation was started with the machine setup switch set to the β1β (ON) position.
Although a simplified synchronization command was specified, simplified synchronization control was not put into effect.
An overload has been detected in a machine having an overload detection option.
The pressure in the C-axis gear lubricating pump system has dropped.
The oil level in the C-axis gear lubricating oil tank is insufficient.
When the milling spindle was not oriented, a milling tool clamp command was entered.
When the tool is being unclamped, a milling spindle unclamp command was entered.
1. HD1 is placed in C-axis mode while HD2 is in turning mode, or HD1 is placed in turning mode while HD2 is in C-axis mode. 2. The gear selection differs between HD1 and HD2.
The door unlock key was pressed in a status where the front door cannot be opened.
A start command was specified with the front door open and the machine setup switch set to the β0β (OFF) position.
An alarm signal has been sent from the high pressure pump system to the NC unit.
The pressure in the coolant unit tank of a machine of the high-pressure coolant specifications has decreased.
The coolant level in the coolant tank has dropped.
For a machine with a warm-up function (optional), a work number search was made for an unregistered program.
For a machine with a warm-up function (optional), a negative number was assigned to the warm-up program.
The machine is currently warming up.
Warm-up operation was stopped due to opening of the front door or setting of the machine setup switch to the β1β (ON) position.
The maintenance door for reaching the grease lubrication tank is open.
The operating panel is not at the right end on a machine equipped with a robot and the robot cannot enter the machine.
No hydraulic pressure is detected at the turning spindle gear lubricating unit.
The oil level at the turning spindle gear lubricating unit is insufficient.
The tailstock travel after pressing the tailstock against the workpiece has exceeded the preset value.
The tailstock position after completing workpiece pressing initiated by M841 or M842 is outside the setting range.
There are missing tailstock-related parameters.
The air pressure for the linear scale is OFF.
The batteries for retaining absolute position data are running low with a voltage drop, or have become exhausted. * Depending on the machine, the message ABSOLUTE POSITION WARNING may be displayed in red.
The system is in energy-saving mode.
The amount of compensation for thermal expansion is significantly different from the previous amount of compensation.
The chucking pressure has been changed with the chuck closed.
Operation of the ATC-related mechanism did not complete within 40 seconds.
A switch on the operating panel is faulty. Or a switch is held down by some external force.
The spindle winding changeover switch is OFF.
The format of the input data is not an available one. Example : Negative data has been input to an item that rejects negative data input.
1. The work number of a display inhibiting program was specified. 2. The numeric value that has been input is out of the allowable range.
The limit of 2000 lines per program has been exceeded.
1. Additional creation of a machining program is no longer possible since the memory has already been filled up to its machining-program data storage capacity. 2. Additional preparation of process control data is no longer possible since 100 sets of such data have already been stored. 3. Additional preparation of program layout data is no longer possible since 4000 sets of such data have already been stored.
An attempt has been made to select a program whose work number has not been registered. An attempt was made to select the work number marked with [!] in the project display.
1. Inhibiting operation (editing, erasing, renumber of work number and entry of names) has been performed for the edit-inhibiting program. 2. The program protect function is set valid. 3. An attempt has been made to carry out βTOOL NAME ORDERβ operation on the TOOL DATA display while a tool remains set in the spindle.
The number or character string that has been designated does not exist in the program.
The memory contents in the machining-program data storage area have been destroyed.
Program data insertion is not possible.
Program deletion is not possible. β’ An attempt has been made to erase the common unit during editing of the MAZATROL program.
A portion of the program may have been destroyed because power has been turned off during program editing.
The number of repeats of subprogram nesting has exceeded nine times.
The program registration has exceeded its maximum value available (Standard: 256 programs).
Automatic determination of the data failed due to an error. No. | Cause --- | --- - | Automatic determination error 1 | Automatic calculation of C-SP, FR or DEP-1 failed because the data (related to tool data) used for calculation are not set. 2 | Automatic calculation of C-SP, FR or DEP-1 failed because the data (related to programs) used for calculation are not set. 3 | (1) Automatic calculation of C-SP, FR or DEP-1 failed because a tool for which cutting conditions cannot be calculated automatically (special tap, special cutter, chip removal, touch sensor, ball end mill, special threading, special turning) is selected. (2) Automatic calculation of βC-SPβ, βFRβ or βDEP-1β failed because a unit for which cutting conditions cannot be calculated automatically (mill-turning unit, turning-drilling unit with a drilling tool (mill spindle)) is selected. 4 | Automatic calculation of C-SP or FR failed during automatic calculation of C-SP, FR and DEP-1 because the data (related to parameters) used for calculation are not set. 5 | Automatic calculation of C-SP, FR or DEP-1 failed because the data (related to the tool file) used for calculation are not set. 6 | Automatic calculation of C-SP or FR failed during automatic calculation of C-SP, FR and DEP-1 because the data (related to CUTTING CONDITION display) used for calculation are not set. 99 | The result of calculation exceeded the setting range permitted in the program during automatic calculation of C-SP, FR and DEP-1.
A G-code not covered by the specifications has been designated.
Tools cannot be automatically developed because of errors of the machining-unit data.
1. An attempt has been made to modify a program whose editing is prohibited. 2. An attempt has been made to edit an EIA program whose size is 32 MB or larger on the PROGRAM display or EIA MONITOR display.
During EIA/ISO conversion, an attempt has been made to perform erasure, work number change or editing of the conversion source program. Or an attempt has been made to select the TOOL PATH CHECK display.
1. The pitch or other data cannot be automatically set because of incorrectness of the tap nominal diameter in the tapping-unit data. 2. Although the text file is referred to for the pipe tap auto-setting (D95 bit 0 = 1), the auto-setting function cannot be executed since the auto-setting text file (Pipescdt. txt) is incorrect or contains no data.
An attempt has been made to input the same data as that which has already been registered. 1. Pocket number in the TOOL LAYOUT display. 2. Machining-program number (changed) 3. Machining priority number 4. Tool model name 5. Tool data suffix
An attempt has been made to designate the data that does not exist.
An attempt has been made to edit or input the machining program, tool data, etc. during I/O operation.
During tool layout, the number of tools used in the designated program has exceeded the maximum available number.
It is not possible to finish the tool layout operation because the pocket number has not yet been assigned to all the required tools.
Processing is not possible because of lack of data. 1. Saving or loading has been attempted without designating any data (such as work numbers, etc.) on the DATA I/O display. 2. The data to be input for restart operation is wanting.
The tool sequence data cannot be automatically developed because of partial lack of the machining-unit data.
An attempt has been made to input unallowable data in the automatic operation mode.
An attempt has been made to input unallowable data on a display (such as the TOOL DATA display) during automatic operation.
The following conditions were not satisfied: Coordinate measurement 1. Automatic operation must not be in progress. 2. The spindle must have a tool mounted on it. 3. The tool data of the tool mounted on the spindle must have already been input. Tool-length measurement 1. Automatic operation must not be in progress.
During creation of a machining program, an attempt has been made to input a tool name not available for the particular program unit, in the tool sequence.
A nonexistent pallet number has been designated.
A nonexistent tool number has been designated.
The number of the machining program that has been designated for program reading from an external unit already exists within the NC memory.
The milling tools (face-mills, end-mills, chamfering cutters, and ball end-mills) that have been designated on the machining program include a one(s) that is not yet registered in the TOOL FILE display.
An attempt has been made to restart on the TOOL PATH display during checking of the tool path.
An unmeasurable tool number has been designated in the automatic tool-length (diameter) measurement mode.
It has been found during tool layout that there is a tool without a nominal diameter in the designated program.
The end unit is not included in the machining program.
A MAZATROL program has been designated for copying purposes during EIA/ISO program editing.
1. The machining program that has been designated on the TOOL LAYOUT, PROCESS CONTROL or SET UP RECORD display is an EIA/ISO program. 2. An EIA/ISO program has been designated for copying purposes during MAZATROL program editing. 3. An EIA/ISO program has been designated as the source program of EIA/ISO conversion. 4. An EIA/ISO program has been designated when writing coordinate values on the MEASURE display.
The head number that has been designated during MDI-MMS setting does not exist in the head data.
No updates can be made to the machining program.
No help display is prepared for the line on which the cursor is placed.
During automatic operation based on the EIA MONITOR display, an attempt has been made to move the cursor to the program section whose editing was prohibited.
An attempt has been made to set tool layout data in a MAZATROL program containing an illegal unit(s).
The block to be searched for at the time of restart of the EIA/ISO program does exist, but the designated number of times of reappearance of the block is too large.
A program error(s) has occurred during EIA/ISO restart search.
EIA/ISO restart searching has not been executed.
An attempt has been made to carry out another search operation when EIA/ISO restart searching had already been finished. An attempt has been made to change the work number when EIA/ISO restart searching had already been finished.
The spindle did not have a mounted touch sensor when an attempt was made to set MAZATROL coordinate measurement data on the PROGRAM (MAZATROL) display.
The materials name that has been designated on the CUTTING CONDITION - W.MAT/T-MAT. display already exists.
No shape data exists in the program unit that has been designated in an attempt to make a copy of shape data.
An attempt has been made to copy shape data whose type is not available for the particular program unit.
Processing not permissible for the current cursor position has been attempted. Example : 1. An attempt has been made to carry out a shape copying operation with the cursor on the tool sequence line. 2. The SHAPE CHECK display has been selected on a shape sequence line not actually executed during automatic operation. Example : 1. No shape data can be copied on the tool sequence line. 2. Review the program.
The machining program currently being edited has been appointed for the particular program copying operation.
The spindle does not currently have a tool mounted on it.
During creation of manual program mode unit, data setting has been attempted without addressing.
An attempt has been made to register a tool most likely to interfere with an adjacent pocket. Example : 1. An attempt has been made to register tool data or tool change data on the TOOL DATA display. 2. An attempt has been made to set such a tool on the TOOL LAYOUT display that is likely to interfere with an adjacent pocket.
1. An attempt has been made to display a program whose display is prohibited. 2. An attempt has been made to display an EIA program whose size is 32 MB or larger on the PROGRAM display, EIA MONITOR display, or POSITION display.
The same priority number is assigned to different tools.
The priority numbering order within a unit is not correct.
A priority number exceeding 99 has occurred because an attempt has been made to move a priority number(s) on the PROGRAM LAYOUT display.
An address not covered by the specifications has been designated during input of subprogram unit addresses on the PROGRAM (MAZATROL) display.
Although an attempt has been made to draw a workpiece shape using the selected EIA/ISO program, shape data is not present in that program.
Although an attempt has been made to draw a workpiece shape using the selected EIA/ISO program, the corresponding shape data is not correct.
The target time of the items which had been set on the MAINTENANCE CHECK display has been exceeded.
The TPC data setting is not possible for the designated unit.
The TPC data for the unit is not correct. After setting the TPC data, the unit machining mode has been changed.
While the cursor was on a line of unit not containing TPC data on the display, [TPC] was tapped during the program list mode.
1. The calculation expressions displayed in the desk calculator window includes expressions that result in a calculation failure. 2. Calculating tool lengths A and B has been attempted in spite of tool nose position storage not being completed.
Although the end-point data of the preceding line was not yet set in the BAR or CPY unit, [NEXT] was tapped.
1. During tape operation mode, an attempt has been made to select the EIA MONITOR display. 2. An attempt has been made to change the operation mode to tape operation mode when the EIA MONITOR display is selected.
An attempt has been made to use an EIA/ISO-option related function in spite of the absence of an EIA/ISO option.
An attempt has been made to use an optional function in spite of the absence of that option.
The maximum memory capacity for drawing tool paths has been consumed in the 3D mode of the TOOL PATH CHECK or TRACE display.
An attempt has been made to copy the coordinates data in WRITE DATA column of the MEASURE display into the designated position, while measurement using the MEASURE display is in progress.
Items necessary for copying units on the PROGRAM (MAZATROL) display have not been selected. No. | Cause --- | --- 0 | The unit to be copied has not been selected. 1 | The copy destination has not been selected.
An I/O operation was attempted on a non-existing directory.
[LENG-OFS TEACH] has been tapped in spite of the fact that a tool not having its βLength Offset Dataβ item displayed on the TOOL DATA display (for example, a turning tool) was mounted in the spindle.
Executing the tool nose position storage function (TEACH) has been attempted when the head index angle displayed in TOOL DATA display mode was neither 0Β°, 90Β°, nor 180Β°.
The use of the jaw shape that has been specified for the program results in interference between adjacent jaws as a result of the SOLID mode PATH CHECK.
Assigning a tool other than an inside-diameter turning tool to the magazine pocket holding the adapter for the long boring bar has been attempted.
Tool data updating operations (such as editing tool data, completing the layout of tools, or downloading data on the DATA I/O display) have been attempted during magazine setup.
An attempt was made to set jaw dimensions without having selected the jaw type (OUT1/IN/OUT2).
The data registration has exceeded its maximum value available. An attempt was made on the TOOL FILE display to register the ninth data item of workpiece material.
Data registration is not yet complete.
Editing the CAD tool model has been attempted.
Assigning dimensions to jaw data for which a shape has not been specified has been attempted.
Execution of tool selection has been attempted under the selected status of a non-magazine type turret.
Registered tool model data contains imperfections (a tool model cannot be drawn with the entered data).
1. An attempt has been made to storage the tool tip position with the head not in its horizontal machining position (TOOL DATA or TOOL OFFSET display only). 2. An attempt has been made to perform MDI-MMS or manual measurement with the head not in its horizontal or vertical machining position. <HV>
Offset data for the selected head is not registered on the HEAD OFFSET display.
An attempt has been made to perform tool tip position storage on the TOOL DATA or TOOL OFFSET display during use of the horizontal type of head.
An external storage medium that contains data other than Smooth system data has been set.
The contents of the external storage medium are not correct. (Loading of a MAZATROL program of more than 2000 lines of data has been attempted.)
An attempt has been made to load more machining programs than the maximum number of programs that can be registered within the NC unit.
An attempt has been made during automatic operation to load data other than machining programs.
Loading has been attempted although the data within the external storage medium does not match to the NC unit (Mismatching in data size, etc.).
An attempt has been made to load the machining program that has the same work number as that of a machining program registered within the NC unit.
The machining program whose saving has been attempted does not exist in the NC unit.
1. An attempt has been made to load machining program data that exceeds the maximum available area for program registration within the NC unit. 2. In the middle of saving onto to the external storage medium, data saving exceeding the memory capacity has been made, or the end-of-tape (or end-of-disk) code has been detected.
Loading has been attempted although the program protect function was set valid.
Comparison between the external storage medium contents and the NC memory contents has shown disparities in data size, type of file information, etc.
Comparison between the cassette tape or floppy disk contents and the NC data has shown several disparities.
An attempt has been made to load an EIA/ISO program in spite of the absence of an EIA/ISO option.
An attempt has been made to load a machining program different in structure from the programs within the NC memory.
An attempt has been made to load data (other than machining program data) that differs in structure from the NC memory data.
1. During I/O operation with a memory card, an attempt has been made to load data the structure of which is not correct. 2. During I/O operation with a floppy disk, an attempt has been made to load data the structure of which is not correct.
1. When program loading was attempted, there was not a comment file (C:\MC_MachinePrograms\index.tbl). 2. An error has occurred within the system.
1. An attempt has been made to save a display inhibiting program. (Program management function) 2. An attempt has been made to save the program being edited or the program being loaded using another I/O unit.
1. An attempt has been made during automatic operation to load data other than machining program data. 2. An attempt has been made to save the data being loaded using another I/O unit. 3. An attempt has been made to load the data being saved using another I/O unit.
The EIA/ISO machining program includes a block that consists of more than 256 characters. (EOB or EOR does not appear within 256 characters.) Note : The number displayed next to the work number is a line number, which corresponds to the number displayed in the lower right section of the PROGRAM display.
Nonconvertible sections have been found when an attempt was made to convert the MAZATROL program into an EIA/ISO program.
The operator has attempted loading a machining program of a scheme different from the program scheme within the NC unit.
An attempt has been made to load the GL setup data that has the same GL setup number as that of setup data registered within the NC unit.
1. The parameter file does not exist under the same directory as that of the program. 2. The G-code is other than standard G-code Series A. 3. The program is a subprogram.
An error has occurred while outputting data of the measurement results print-out function to a local disk.
Communication error has occurred during the PROFIBUS-DP communication using a field network expansion card. Note : 1. OO xx Ξβ Global error bit Lββ Indicates the error status (hexadecimal). 01: Control error (parameter error) 02: Auto clear error (Since an update at a slave station has failed, updates at all slave stations have stopped.) 04: No-exchange error (a slave station has an update error) 08: Critical error (communication cannot continue due to a serious network problem) 10: Not ready (NC communication is not ready) 20: Timeout error (a timeout is detected during an update with each station) Master communication status Indicates the status of the master station (hexadecimal). 00: Off-line (being initialized) 40: Stop (I/O stopped) 80: Clear (resetting the output data from each slave station by sending β0β data) C0: Running (I/O being updated) 2. OO ΞΞ Lβ Slave communication status Ξβ Indicates the communication status of the slave station at which a communication error is occurring (hexadecimal). 00: The target slave exists on the bus. An appropriate data communication is being made between the master station and the target slave station. 01: No data communication is being made between the master station and the target slave station. Configuration with the target slave station may not be finished correctly. There may be no response from the target slave station. 02: No data communication may be being made between the master station and the target slave station. Diagnosis information from the target slave station may exist in the internal buffer of the master station. 03: The target slave exists on the bus. An appropriate data communication is being made between the master station and the target slave station. Diagnosis information from the target slave station may exist in the internal buffer of the master station. Slave station number Indicates the number of the slave station at which a communication error is occurring (hexadecimal). However, if no communication is being made with the master station, β00β is displayed. 00: No communication is being made with the master station. 01: Station No. 1 02: Station No. 2 : 7D: Station No. 125
1. Communication error has occurred during the EtherNet/IP communication using a field network expansion card. 2. EtherNet/IP connection wait time setting may not be appropriate. Note : 1. OO xx Ξβ Adaptor status Lββ 0x00: Scanner stopped or connection failed 0x01: Communication being made 0x02: Communication stopped (communication with at least one adaptor station has stopped) Scanner status 0x01: Configuration not finished 0x02: Stopped 0x03: Idling 0x04: Running 2. OOOO Ξβ Communication error details Lββ 0x0000: Scanner stopped or connection failed 0x0124: Parameter error 0x000c: Watchdog timeout 0x0125: Illegal network address 0x0100: Initialization failed 0x0126: No security memory 0x0101: Database access failed 0x0140: Network failure 0x0119: Configuration not executed 0x0141: Communication failure 0x0120: Configuration failed 0x0142: Communication timeout 0x0121: Data mismatch 0x0143: Network isolation 0x0122: Data discrepancy 0x0144: Node redundancy 0x0123: Inadequate data license 0x0145: Cable not connected
Note :1.Cause1: The value at R19974 (field network output data top register) is out of the setting range.2: The value at R19976 (field network input data top register) is out of the setting range.3: The value specified at the register R for high-speed data input/output is out of the setting range.4: The value of parameter F150 is out of the setting range.2.Field network expansion card type0: Not connected1: PROFIBUS-DP unit2: EtherNet/IP unit
A communication error has occurred in the CC-LINK communication.
This message implies incorrect cable connection between CMT (cassette magnetic tape unit) or microdisk unit and the NC unit, or implies a power-off status or an incorrect baud-rate setting.In the case of microdisk unit, this message also implies incorrect setting of a floppy disk.
The machining program or another data that has been designated for the LOAD or COMPARE operation does not exist within the cassette tape or floppy disk.
A cassette tape or floppy disk drive has not been mounted.
The current M640 series-use cassette tape or floppy disk does not contain a saved machining program (only machining programs can be loaded from M640 series-use cassette tape or floppy disk).The cassette tape or floppy disk that has been registered for M640 series use does not contain a registered machining program.
A hardware error has occurred in the CMT or microdisk unit.
Data saving onto a write-protected cassette tape or floppy disk has been attempted.The cassette tape or floppy disk is protected against data writing.
Power has been turned off during operation of the CMT or microdisk unit.
Data cannot be read because of the presence of check sum errors, for example, within the cassette tape or floppy disk contents.
Connection cables between the CC-LINK unit and each device are disconnected or broken.
β
This message implies incorrect cable connection between tape reader or microdisk unit and the NC unit or implies a power-off state. In the case of microdisk unit, this message also implies incorrect setting of a floppy disk.
This message implies incorrect cable connection between tape puncher or microdisk unit and the NC unit or implies a power-off state. In the case of microdisk unit, this message also implies incorrect setting of a floppy disk.
An attempt has been made to carry out a tape I/O operation although the tape reader/puncher option is not provided.
Loading or comparing is not possible since no O numbers (work numbers) are stored on the paper tape or floppy disk.
1. The tape reader/puncher is not correctly loaded with paper tape.2. Differences in baud-rate or other parameter settings for RS-232C exist between the tape reader/puncher (or microdisk unit) and the NC unit.
Power has been turned off during operation of the tape reader/puncher or microdisk unit.
A hardware error has occurred in the tape reader or the microdisk unit.
A hardware error has occurred in the tape puncher or the microdisk unit.
An attempt has been made to punch a MAZATROL program onto paper tape.
The designated data was not found on the paper tape or floppy disk.
The contents of the paper tape or floppy disk cannot be read since they include a parity-H error(s). (The number of holes on tape must always be even for ISO; it must be odd for EIA).β Sprocket
The contents of the paper tape or floppy disk cannot be read since they include a parity-V error(s).The number of sprocket holes in this area must be even.
A machining program in which EOR precedes the end M-code (M02, M30 or M99) or the next O number (work number) was loaded.The end-of-program condition can be changed by varying the settings of the parameter (TAP27).
An attempt has been made to load the program of a work number of more than four digits in spite of the fact that the maximum allowable number of digits in one work number is set to four.
Power has been turned off during EIA/ISO conversion.
β
β
The designated directory does not exist.
An error in printer communications has occurred during measurement result printing.
β
Erroneous cable connection has occurred during connection of the ID unit and the NC unit, or power has remained turned off.
Power has been turned off during the operation of the ID unit.
Communication between the NC unit and the ID unit has become interrupted because of hardware trouble (such as line noise).
An error occurred in bar loader communication with the IBS (intelligent bar loader system).Note :1. Details of communication error1: Transmission of the schedule data does not start.2: Writing of the material length and cut-off position does not complete.3: Inconsistent work number.4: Transmission of top-cut work number does not start.5: Inconsistent top-cut work number2. Schedule number that caused communication error.
β
DNC operation was attempted although DNC option is not provided.
Data other than that of the MATRIX system, Smart, or the Smooth system has been received from the host (the format of the message is incorrect).
The contents of the transmitted machining program from the host system are not correct.(More than 2000 lines of MAZATROL program data have been transmitted.)
An attempt has been made to load more machining programs than the maximum number of programs that can be registered within the NC unit.
An attempt has been made during automatic operation to load data other than machining program data.
Loading has been attempted when the transmitted data from the host system does not match to the data or other parameter settings within the NC unit (mismatching in data size, etc.).
An attempt has been made to load the machining program that has the same work number as that of a machining program registered within the NC unit.
The machining program whose transmission from the NC unit to the host system has been attempted does not exist within the NC unit.The machining program that has been designated using a control command (work number search or program deletion) does not exist within the NC unit.
An attempt has been made to load more machining programs than the maximum number of programs that can be registered within the NC unit.
Loading has been attempted although the program protect function was set valid.
---
---
A file different from the one that has been requested from NC unit to the host system was transferred from the latter.
An attempt has been made to load a machining program that is different in structure from those stored within the NC unit.
An attempt has been made to load data other than machining program data and also different in structure from the data stored within the NC unit.The contents of the header block or data block in the file transfer message (including machining programs) are not correct.
This message implies incorrect cable connection between the host system and the NC unit or implies a power-off status.
An error has occurred within the system.
1. An attempt has been made to transmit a display inhibiting program to the host system. (Program management function)2. An attempt has been made to transmit to the host system the program being edited (or the program being loaded using another I/O unit).
An attempt has been made during automatic operation to load data other than machining program data.An attempt has been made to transmit to the host system the data being loaded using another I/O unit.An attempt has been made to load the data being saved using another I/O unit.
The EIA/ISO machining program includes a block that consists of more than 256 characters. (EOB or EOR is not present within 256 characters.)Note :The number displayed next to the work number is a line number, which corresponds to the number displayed in the lower right section of the PROGRAM display.
The particular status of the NC unit disables execution of the control command that has been requested from the host system.A request for work number search has been made during automatic operation.During automatic operation, a request for deleting the machining program being used for the automatic operation has been made.
An attempt has been made to load (save) the data not supported by the current option of the DNC unit.
The control command or file transfer command that has been requested from the host system is a nonexistent command.The machine number that has been designated for the loading of data other than machining program data does not agree with any of the machine numbers within the NC unit.
During use of DNC, processing has been aborted by line noise or other hardware factors.RS-232C communication parameter settings (such as those of the baud-rate, etc.) between the host system and NC unit differ.Timer, number-of-retries or other settings are not correct.
The preset number of retries has been exceeded during transmission/reception of command messages.RS-232C communication parameter settings (such as those of the baud-rate, etc.) between the host system and NC unit differ.Timer, number-of-retries or other settings are not correct.
The preset number of retries has been exceeded during transmission/reception of the messages.RS-232C communication parameter settings (such as those of the baud-rate, etc.) between the host system and NC unit differ.Timer, number-of-retries or other settings are not correct.
An irretrievable hardware error has occurred during reception of the first message (ENQ) from the host system.
Power has been turned off during DNC operation.
An attempt has been made to transfer EIA/ISO program although the NC unit is not provided with an EIA/ISO option.
The host system has issued a request for transmission/reception of data not existing within the NC unit.A drum-tool data transfer request has been issued to the NC unit though it is not provided with a drum.A request for transfer of a larger volume of data than the control data stored within the NC unit has been made.
β
A processing error has occurred within the NC unit.
An attempt has been made to start the program being transferred.
The program having the work number that has been set in the subprogram unit does not exist within the memory.No work number has been set in the subprogram unit.The work number that has been designated as the restart position does not exist within the memory.
Pitch X is not yet set in spite of the fact that multi-piece machining in the direction of the X-axis is to take place.Pitch Y is not yet set in spite of the fact that multi-piece machining in the direction of the Y-axis is to take place.
The point-, line- or face-machining (including 3-D) unit does not contain any tool sequences.
The point-, line- or face-machining (including 3-D) unit does not have any shape data.
A point-machining unit lacks data.
A line-machining unit lacks data.
A face-machining unit lacks data.
A point-machining tool sequence lacks data.
A line-machining tool sequence lacks data.
A face-machining (including 3-D) tool sequence lacks data.
The WPC unit lacks data.
The maximum permissible number of repeats of MAZATROL program nesting has been exceeded nine.
The offset unit lacks data.
The M-code unit contains no data.
The data processing operation cannot be performed because of contradiction in data. This condition occurs if an attempt is made to start automatic operation when the specified work number is an unregistered number.
The point-machining parameter setting(s) is out of its permissible range.
The line- or face-machining parameter settings are out of their permissible ranges.
Of tool sequence data (except for chip removal), the surface speed (C-SP) is unset or set to "0".
Of tool sequence data (except for chip removal), the feedrate (FR) is unset or set to "0".
The unit that has been designated as the restart position is not present in the program with the specified work number.
The tool sequence that has been designated as the restart position is not present in the unit of the specified work number or two or more lines of tool sequence data are present in the line-machining chamfering unit.
The unit that has been designated as the restart position is the end unit.The designated number of times of reappearance (L) is too large and the corresponding restart position is not present.The restart data is incomplete.
The value of "(groove width) - (finish allowance R) Γ 2" of the endmill groove unit is smaller than the "tool diameter" value of the rough-machining tool.The "groove width" value of the endmill groove unit is smaller than the "tool diameter" value of the finishing tool.
The tool(s) specified in the program is not registered in the tool data.
The data of the tool length or tool diameter is not yet input on the TOOL DATA display.
The tool specified in the program is not registered on the TOOL FILE display.
The tool file lacks of data.
Of the line- or face-machining tool sequence data, the value of the Z depth of cut is in excess of the depth of cut on the TOOL FILE display.
The value of "(removal allowance R) - (finish allowance R)" in the line-machining unit is larger than the value of the tool diameter of the rough-cutting tool.The value of removal allowance R in the line-machining unit is larger than the value of the tool diameter of the finishing tool.
Of line- or face-machining tool sequence data, the radial depth of cut is set to zero or smaller.
Of line- or face-machining tool sequence data, the Z depth of cut is set to zero or smaller.
The finish allowance value in the line- or face-machining unit is set to zero in spite of the fact that a finishing tool is registered.
Of tool data, the tool diameter setting is zero.
In the line- or face-machining unit, removal allowance Z is smaller than finish allowance Z.
In the line- or face-machining unit, removal allowance R is smaller than finish allowance R.
Of the face-machining tool sequence data, the setting of the radial depth of cut is smaller than the tool diameter setting on the TOOL DATA display.
The pallet number that has been set in the pallet changing unit is larger than the maximum allowable number of pallets set in the parameter L46.
The data that has been set in the angle item of the indexing unit is that which cannot be divided by the parameter L37 setting (minimum allowable angle of index).
The pallet changing unit or the indexing unit lacks of unit data.Initial point Z is not yet set in the common unit.CPT-X, CPT-Z or rotational direction is not yet set in the mill-turning unit.When "SHIFT - R.T." is set in the WPC shift unit with the machine equipped with table selection function, the rotational center is not set in the table selection unit.The table is not set in the table selection unit.
The same pallet number as the current pallet number has been set as the next one.
The manual program mode unit contains a sequence that has no data.
The nominal diameter item of the tool sequence data is not complete. The nominal diameter item of the MMS unit or the manual program mode unit (when a tool is set) is not complete.
The same priority number is assigned to different tools.
The priority numbering order within a unit is not correct.* During setting the priority numbers on the PROGRAM display.** During setting the priority numbers on the PROGRAM LAYOUT display - data in the layout lines LNo. 1 and LNo. 2 are not correct.
The end unit is not present in the program.
More than 10 sets of offset data have been input for multi-piece machining.
The measurement sequence lacks of data.
Cutting is impossible because the chamfering cutter is likely to come into contact with the wall or bottom of the workpiece during chamfering.The data of the specified chamfering cutter on the TOOL DATA or TOOL FILE display is not appropriate.
An attempt has been made to execute the point-, line- or face-machining MAZATROL program when the setting of parameter SA51 was "5" or more.
The tool sequence data contains an unavailable milling spindle gear-shift M-code(s).
Tools that cannot be used have been designated.
The tool length and tool diameter settings on the TOOL DATA display are negative.
The program is destroyed.
The measurement units include one that has no sequence data.
The program contains incorrect data.
The setting of the material height in the 3-D machining unit is greater than that of initial point Z in the common unit.
The tool path check cannot be performed since I/O operation (loading) is in progress.
The Y-axis or Z-axis of the index position has been appointed using the indexing unit when the parameter L41 is set to "2".
M195 (tool breakage detection start command code) has been set for the M-code unit or for the manual program mode sequence.
An attempt has been made to execute the inclined-plane machining program in the absence of an inclined-plane machining option.
1. A corner-face unit or plane inclination measurement has been designated in unit data other than inclined-plane machining unit data.2. Table rotational machining has been designated in spite of the fact that the facial angle data in the face definition sequence is not for the top plane.3. Calibration measurement has been designated for the top plane or an inclined plane.4. Groove center, hole center, boss center, and step width measurements have been designated for an inclined plane.5. Machining at the work hand side ββZβ (B-axis at 90Β°, approach in the Z-axis) has been specified for the direction of the geometry sequence in coordinate measurement.6. Machining at the work hand side ββZβ (B-axis at 90Β°, approach in the Z-axis) has been specified for the direction of the geometry sequence in workpiece measurement.7. Measurement at the work hand side has been attempted with the parameter setting of L106 bit5 = 0 (B-axis user-defined angle measurement invalid).
A 3-D machining unit has been set in the program in spite of the fact that 3-D machining option is not provided.
The 3-D machining unit lacks of unit data.
The 3-D machining unit lacks of plane definition data.
The 3-D machining unit lacks of check surface data.
The plane definition data in the 3-D machining unit is not complete.
The value of the tolerance parameter that has been designated in the tool sequence is "0".
The tool sequence in the 3-D machining unit lacks of data.
The coordinate conversion data in the 3-D machining unit is not complete.
In the check surface data of the 3-D machining unit, the setting of the maximum value is smaller than that of the minimum value.
In the ruled-surface unit, the number of FLs is in excess of 20, or in the line- or face-machining unit, the number of defined figures is in excess of 2.
An attempt has been made to execute a five-surface machining program when the five-surface machining option was not present.
A face that cannot be cut with the selected head has been designated.
1. The face definition unit or 5-face machining unit includes illegal units and measurement sequences.Illegal units and sequences:face definition unit, pallet change unit, process end unit, index unit, WPC unit, and measurement of workpiece inclination.2. An MMS unit has been set in the program that has table rotational machining designated in its face definition sequence.3. Executing the mill-turning unit has been attempted in a machine not having a mill-turning option.4. An attempt was made to run a program including a table selection unit on the machine not equipped with table selection function or the machine equipped with table selection function but while the function is invalid (parameter D106 bit 4 = 0).5. C-axis machining has been selected for machining at the work hand side. Or, turning has been selected for machining at the work hand side.6. Workpiece measurement has been executed with the work hand at 0Β° other than in the workpiece transfer unit.7. An attempt was made to execute an engraving unit on a machine that does not feature the engraving function option.8. A 5-face machining unit is contained in the program set for multiple machining.
Head data corresponding to the head of the designated head number does not exist.
In the line- or face-machining unit, the coordinates of the intersection point of figures cannot be obtained because of shortage of, or contradiction, in the free-shape data.
The figures cannot be connected smoothly at corner R because of contradiction in the data of corner R or in the data of the figures in front and rear of corner R.
The point-machining units include one(s) that has more than 500 holes defined in it.
Corner rounding or corner chamfering has been set at the starting or ending point of a figure when defining figures in the central linear machining, right-hand linear machining, left-hand linear machining, right-hand chamfering or left-hand chamfering units.
Contradiction presides in the figure rotation or figure shift data that has been set during defining free figures in the line- or face-machining unit.
The specified size of corner rounding or chamfering is inadmissible.Example :This alarm does not occur in general unless the specified size of rounding or chamfering exceeds the length of one of the two sides of the corner concerned. As for a rectangular line- or face-machining shape described with the aid of [SQUARE], in particular, the size in question for corners CN1 (starting point) and CN4 (ending point) must not exceed half the length of the side between them since the cutting start position will be set in actual machining to the mid-point of that side.
The point-machining shape definition data is not appropriate.
When the shape pattern is βsquareβ, the input data cannot be used to make shape definitions.
During input of free-shape data (open-figure data) to the line-machining unit, β?β has been set as the definition of the starting point.
During input of free-shape data (open-figure data) to the line-machining unit, β?β has been set as the definition of the ending point.
The coordinates of the intersection point cannot be calculated since the free-shape input data in the line- or face-machining unit is incomplete.
1. The line- or face-machining unit contains too much free-shape input data, and there is contradiction between overlapping data.2. Too many tool sequences have been set for the line- or face-machining unit.
Contradiction exists in the free-shape data that have been set to define arc in the line- or face-machining units.
The second figures (inside figures) are not yet defined in the endmilling-mountain (STEP), pocket milling-mountain or pocket milling-valley unit.
The number of points which are necessary to define the shapes designated in the line- or face-machining unit exceeds 200.
Among the line- or face-machining units is one(s) that contains more shapes than allowable within one unit.
Fixed shapes are included in the shape data (open figures) of the central linear machining, right-hand linear machining, left-hand linear machining, right-hand chamfering, left-hand chamfering or endmilling-groove units.
It is not possible to draw a tangent line from point P1 since it is inside the arc.
βLeftβ or βrightβ is set for the crossing point (P), though βupβ or βdownβ should have been set.
The crossing point (P) is not yet input in spite of the fact that there are more than two points of intersection with the arc.
The coordinate values of the start point and end point are the same.
The two straight lines are parallel to each other, and thus the coordinates of their intersection point cannot be obtained.
β
The shape compensation clearance with respect to the shape of the endmilling-top is too large; or the tool diameter with respect to the size of the line-inside machining is too large.
1. The input shape is contradictory to logic, that is, the radius of the arc, for example, does not agree with the distance from the center.2. An attempt was made to execute the smooth chamfering program when CHMF in the end milling slot unit is set to other than 0, when an arc is specified or when the shape sequence is specified in three or more lines.
The machining conditions are incorrect (for example, the radial depth of cut is zero).
In area machining, the tool diameter with respect to the figure is too large.
1. The approach point cannot be obtained.2. The approach path or retract path may interfere with the programmed shape.
The shape has been separated into three segments or more as a result of offsetting.The inside form does not contain the center of the outside form for outside-related fixed path.The outside form is concave for inside-related fixed path.The inside form is not adequate since it contains a concave or an intersection.
1. The chamfering tool interferes with the side wall or bottom.2. The tool edge is not in perfect contact with the surface to chamfer.3. A chamfering tool with a chamfering angle other than 45Β° is used for Smooth chamfering.
In the EIA program, the total number of characters within one block is in excess of 248.
No automatic calculations of intersection were obtained since there is no or too short a distance between end points of the shape.
The programmed amount of round chamfering differs from the following:(NOM-Ξ¦ β MIN-Ξ¦)/2where NOM-Ξ¦ and MIN-Ξ¦ are the setting values of the selected tool on the TOOL FILE display.
Unset unit data exists for the unit you have made an attempt to execute.
Sequence data for the unit you have made an attempt to execute does not match to the unit data.
1. No sequence data exists for the unit you have made an attempt to execute.2. The machine was operated or a tool path check was performed with βDEP-1β or βFRβ set to β?β.
Data out of the allowable setting range exists in the sequence data of the unit you have made an attempt to execute.
The specified infeed point is outside the profile of the workpiece (approximate workpiece shape designated by common unit).
The relative position of the starting or ending point specified by the sequence data with respect to the specified infeed point is not appropriate.
The starting or ending point is outside the profile of the workpiece (approximate workpiece shape specified by common unit).
The direction of machining (forward/backward) cannot be determined using the specified infeed point and sequence data.
Part of the defined shape is opposite in direction of machining with respect to the reference axis movement direction.
The defined workpiece shape has overlaps.
Arc-drawing data you have specified is illegal.That is, the relationship between the starting point, ending point, and radius of the arc is incorrect.It is impossible to define an arc.
There are the following errors related to the designated corner C data:<BAR, CPY, CORNER>The arc length of the block present before or after corner C is smaller than that of corner C.<T, GROOV>Added corner C is outside the workpiece profile.
Defined shape of machining or of the workpiece is too complicated to be processed.
The total number of valleys in the machining shape is in excess of 16.
OD-MAX and ID-MIN in the common unit do not satisfy the following condition:OD-MAX > ID-MIN β₯ 0
LENGTH, WORK FACE and FIN-LENGTH do not satisfy the following condition:LENGTH β₯ WORK FACE + FIN-LENGTH > 0
There is a data overlap between the inside diameter side (IN) and outside diameter side (OUT) of the workpiece shape which has been designated in the MATERIAL unit.
The area to be rough-cut does not exist since the designated finishing allowance is larger than the shape defined by the sequence data.
In the CORNER unit data, the relationship between the starting point and the ending point is wrong.
In the FACING unit data, the relationship between the starting point and the ending point is wrong.
The designated number of cutting times for #0, #3 thread type is less than 3.
The calculated distance of threading acceleration is in excess of the allowable value.
In the T. GROOV unit data, the relationship between the starting point and the ending point is wrong.
For machining of multiple grooves, the second and subsequent grooves are outside the workpiece profile defined by common unit.
The designated tool width does not match to the groove shape specified in the T. GROOV unit.
The parameter-set amount of grooving overlap is larger than the width or diameter of the designated tool.
In the T-DRILL or T-TAP unit data, the relationship between the starting point and the ending point is wrong.
In the unit (BAR, CPY, etc.), different types of corners (R and C) have been designated for portions that are identical in shape.
In the #0, #D type of THREAD unit data, the following condition exists:(Finishing allowance) > (First depth-of-cut/4)Calculated from the height (HGT) and the number of times (NUMBER) in unit data.Specified by parameter TC78.
The relationship between the thread shape and threading angle that are defined by the first sequence data of the THREAD unit is incorrect.
In the machining type that requires the designation of a threading angle, the following condition is not satisfied.(Tool tip angle) β€ (Threading angle)
In the THREAD unit data, the following condition is not satisfied.(Finishing allowance) β€ (Thread height)Designated in the unit data.Set using parameter TC78.
No automatic calculations of intersection were obtained since there are shape sequence data disparities.
No automatic calculations of intersection were obtained since there are lack of data to automatically calculate a point of intersection.
No automatic calculations of intersection were obtained since there are illegal data in the program.
A cutting depth cannot be determined for the tool since the DEPTH or CUT ANGLE data item on the TOOL DATA display is left blank.
Executing the chip-cutting cycle program has been attempted in spite of the chip-cutting cycle option being absent.(3 or 4 has been assigned to PAT. in the roughing tool sequence.)
1. A normal path cannot be created since the cutting area is wider than twice the depth of cut per pass.2. When the cutting area is equal to the clearance, a normal path cannot be created since the cutting area is wider than the depth of cut per pass.3. A normal path cannot be created since the cutting area overlaps the deceleration distance and is wider than the depth of cut per pass.
1. Shape drawing of the program set with workpiece placement error correction was attempted on the TRACE display.2. Shape drawing of a main program that does not contain turning operation but calls a subprogram containing turning operation was attempted on a VARIAXIS machine featuring the turning function.
β
A curved surface that cannot be machined has been defined.
The check surface values are incorrect.1. For rough-machining 1 or 2: Check surface Z min. β₯ material height2. For finishing: Check surface Z min. > initial Z3. Check surface X min. > X max., or Y min. > Y max., or Z min. > Z max.
In rough-machining 2, the tool diameter is extremely small in comparison with the dimensions of the defined 3-D figure.
Tool interference has occurred.
In rough-machining 2, the pitch in the radial direction is extremely small in comparison with the dimensions of the defined 3-D figure.
In rough-machining 2, the pitch in the Z direction is extremely small in comparison with the dimensions of the defined 3-D figure.
1. For rough-machining 2 with designation of workpiece size, the dimensions of the defined figure are larger than those of the workpiece.2. For rough-machining 2, a material height smaller than β(height of the Z bottom of the 3-D figure) + (height of a machining area outside the figure)β [parameters E84, E89] has been set irrespective of designating the offset amount or the workpiece size.
In rough-machining 1 or 2, initial Z β€ material height.
The workpiece shape cannot be defined since, in a program of workpiece scheme (MILL & TURN) with WPC setting, no WPC unit is prepared before machining units.
1. In a program of workpiece scheme (MILL & TURN) with WPC setting, the workpiece origin specified in the WPC unit which precedes C-axis point/line machining or turning units does not correspond to the axis of turning.2. Additional basic coordinate system or work offset value is set in the WPC unit preceded by the common unit.
In a program of workpiece scheme (MILL & TURN) with WPC setting, the machining section specified in a C-axis point/line machining or turning unit does not correspond to the B-axis angle specified in an index unit.
It was attempted to set a turning or C-axis point/line machining unit in a program of initial-point scheme (ONLY MILL).
It was attempted to execute restart operation from, or single-process operation of, an unsuitable unit.
There are programming units of workpiece scheme with WPC setting and of the same scheme with Z-offset setting prepared in one and the same program.
The indispensable Z-offset is not yet set for a program of workpiece scheme (MILL & TURN) with Z-offset setting.
It was attempted to run a program which contains a process with more than 4000 layout data items.The number of repetitions exceeds 9999990 for a program (CONTI. = 1 in the END unit) without workpiece transfer unit.
The setting in the parameter for the retraction tool is not correct.
The setting for simultaneous machining is not correct.(Example : Only the upper or the lower turret is specified for simultaneous machining.)
The specification of the direction of turning spindle rotation differs between those tools on the upper and lower turrets which are to be used for simultaneous machining.
For the execution of a composite program: The settings in the common unit do not satisfy the following condition:FIN-LENGTH β€ LENGTH β WORK FACE.
A unit of machining with the lower turret (or including a command for its retraction) is created within a program whose common unit declares (under LOW TURR) that the lower turret is βnot usedβ.
1. For the execution of a composite program: Machining units are not preceded by a head selection unit (HEAD).2. For the execution of a composite program: The workpiece transfer unit (TRANSFER) is not followed by a HEAD unit.
For the execution of an independent program: A workpiece transfer unit (TRANSFER) is erroneously set in a program to be run independently on either HD side.
For the execution of an independent program: A head selection unit (HEAD) is erroneously set in a program to be run independently on either HD side.
For tool selection on a turret-type tool-post: The section to be machined by the selected tool differs from the corresponding setting in the unit data line.
A Y-axis machining unit is created for a turret not correspondingly executed.
The restarting function has been started from the balanced-cutting with the lower turret.
The single-process function has been applied to the balanced-cutting with the lower turret.
β
The programmed shape of the approach path and/or retraction path interferes with the workpiece (programmed machining shape + machining allowance).
In a 2 WORKPC unit the selection of the turret in the tool sequence does not correspond to the selection of the spindle (SP1 or SP2) in the unit data line.
The 2 WORKPC machining unit is not preceded by a workpiece transfer unit.
There is an instruction of simultaneous machining given in the flow of β2 Workpieceβ machining.
There is an instruction of balanced cutting given in the flow of β2 Workpieceβ machining.
There is an instruction of retraction given in the flow of β2 Workpieceβ machining.
There is a measurement unit inserted in the flow of β2 Workpieceβ machining.
There is a workpiece transfer unit inserted in the flow of β2 Workpieceβ machining.
The head selection unit in the mode of β2 Workpieceβ machining has another setting than SINGLE under TYPE.
1. For a flow of β2 Workpieceβ machining an end instruction is given before the start instruction.2. For a flow of β2 Workpieceβ machining a restart instruction is given before the end instruction.3. In a flow of β2 Workpieceβ machining, only one spindle is specified in the head selection unit and machining instruction is given for only one spindle.
1. Only a single line of tool sequence is created for balanced cutting.2. Tools different in shape (nose angle, infeed angle and nose R) are designated for the upper and lower turret in balanced cutting.
The surface speed data set in the tool sequence contains an invalid value.
The feed data set in the tool sequence contains an invalid value.
If DRILL is selected as the turning drilling unit tool:1. The milling spindle speed is less than the turning spindle speed when the rotation direction set in the tool sequence is the same as that of the milling spindle.2. The milling spindle speed has exceeded the maximum rotation speed (SA1 to SA8) when the rotation direction set in the tool sequence is the same as that of the milling spindle.3. The milling spindle speed is set to a negative value when the rotation direction set in the tool sequence is opposite to that of the milling spindle.4. When the direction of rotation in the tool sequence is the opposite of the direction of mill spindle rotation, the turning spindle speed matches the relative speed calculated from the surface speed.
For ATC (BA47 = 0) turret type machines with B-axis (BA48 = B), the direction of βpart to be machinedβ set with the turning drilling unit does not match with the B-axis angle set with the index unit.
When the amount of SHIFT-Y is not equal to zero in the mill-turning unit, the amount of SHIFT-Y is smaller than the radius of the tool or greater than (workpiece radius + tool radius).
An attempt was made to execute a MAZATROL program with lower turret control enabled although the MAZATROL lower turret control option is unavailable.
The cycle start button has been pressed when the barrier was canceled.
The cycle start button has been pressed when a jaw No. was not assigned.
β
β
The number of axis motion commands given in one block is in excess of the number of simultaneously controllable axes.
1. The axis address names assigned in the program are different from those which have been parametrized.2. Bit 4 of parameter M17 for the shaping control axis (the axis specified in parameter K3) is set to β0β (linear axis).
A distance of axis movement that cannot be divided by the preset command unit has been assigned.
On paper tape, the number of holes per character is even for EIA code or odd for ISO code.
On paper tape, the number of holes per block is odd.
An address that is not covered in the specifications has been used.
1. The format in which the data has been designated in the program is incorrect.2. Under the condition of workpiece placement error correction, or tool tip point control, an axis address other than those for the five controlled axes concerned (as specified in parameters K114, K115, K116, K121, and K125) was used in a motion command block.3. The engraving program contains a format error.A text string containing 100 characters or more was specified.A character that cannot be engraved was specified.Engraving was specified with another command in the same block.
A G-code that is not covered in the specifications has been designated.
The assigned data for the address is out of the allowable setting range.
βEORβ has been detected during tape or memory operation.
Zeroes have been designated as program or sequence numbers.
An error has been found to exist in the pre-read block during execution of tool diameter offset.
The inch/metric selection command has been issued using the G-code although a G-code inch/metric selection function is not provided.
The specified moving distance is too long.
Program command G60 has been designated although a unidirectional positioning function is not provided.
The feedrate command has not been input.
The relationship between the starting and ending points of the arc and the center of the arc is not appropriate.
For arc interpolation by R designation, the coordinates of the center of the arc cannot be calculated.Axis moving by manual interruption is specified in immediate front of the arc command. The arc cannot be defined since the relationship between the starting point, ending point, and radius of the arc becomes incorrect.
The helical interpolation command has been issued although such an interpolation function is not provided.
The spiral interpolation command (G02.1 or G03.1) has been issued although such an interpolation function is not provided.
The virtual-axis command (G07) has been issued although there are not virtual-axis specifications.
A G-code command has been specified in illegal modal data.
A plane selection command (G17, G18 or G19) has been issued during figure rotation.
A plane selection command (G17, G18 or G19) has been specified in the coordinates rotation command (G68).
A plane selection command (G17, G18 or G19) has been specified during tool diameter offset (G41 or G42).
The synchronous feed command (G95) has been specified although such feed specifications are not provided.
The F 1-digit rapid-feed command (F0) has been specified during arc interpolation (G02 or G03).
The automatic corner override command (G62) has been specified although such an override function is not available.
The secondary auxiliary function address that has been specified in the program is different from the corresponding address that has been parameterized.
The constant surface speed command (G96) has been specified although such specifications are not provided.
A tool-position compensation command (G45 to G48) has been specified although such specifications are not provided.
Tool-position compensation has been specified during figure rotation or coordinates rotation.
An arc command that is not available for tool-position compensation has been specified.
A tool diameter offset command (G41 or G42) has been specified although such specifications are not provided.
A compensation command (G40, G41, G42) has been specified during the arc mode (G02 or G03 command).
In tool diameter offset (G41 or G42), the coordinates of the intersection point existing when a block was skipped in processing of interference blocks cannot be calculated.
An interference error has occurred during execution of tool diameter offset (G41 or G42).
The three-dimensional compensation command has been designated although such compensation specifications are not provided.
A compensation command (G41 or G42) has been designated without a compensation number (Dββ); or the compensation number is larger than the maximum number of sets of compensation numbers available in the specifications.
A fixed-cycle G-code has been designated although fixed-cycle specifications are not provided.
The tools that are not yet registered on the TOOL DATA display are specified using T-code command in an EIA/ISO program.
1. The total number of sequential calls of subprogram has exceeded eight.2. Execution of a program that includes an βM99β command was attempted in the direct operation mode using HD or Ethernet.3. The program in the HD or host called a program stored in the HD or host.
The sequence number for subprogram call, for return from a subprogram or for the GOTO designation is not yet set.
An attempt was made to call a subprogram which was not yet registered.
A variables number has been designated although variables number (#ββ) specifications are not provided.
The designated variables number is larger than the maximum variables number permitted by the specifications.
β=β was not designated in the definition of a variable.
A figure rotation command has been designated although figure rotation specifications are not provided.
One figure rotation command has been designated during execution of another such command.
A figure rotation command and a coordinates rotation command are designated at the same time.
The coordinates rotation command (G68) has been designated although coordinates rotation specifications are not provided.
Macro specifications have been designated although such specifications are not provided.
A user macro interruption command has been designated although such interruption specifications are not provided.
An NC statement and a macro statement are present in one block.
The maximum permissible degree of multiplicity of user macro calls has been exceeded.
The number of sets of user macro call arguments of type II is too large.
Command G67 has been designated when G66 command modal state was not yet set.
The total number of β[β and β]β within one block has become more than five.
The total number of β[β and β]β within one block differ.
The operation expression is not correct.
The denominator in the division expression is zero.
The integral value has overstepped β2Β³ΒΉ (2Β³ΒΉβ1) in the operation process.
The variables data is overflowing.
The statement of IF [<conditional expression>] GOTO is wrong.
The statement of WHILE [<conditional expression>] DO ~ END is wrong.
The SETVN statement containing the variables name is wrong.
Of WHILE [<conditional expression>] DO ~ END, DO ~ END has appeared more than 27 times (degree of multiplicity).
The DOβs and ENDβs are not formed in pairs.
During tape operation, macro command (WHILE, DO, END, IF, GOTO, POPEN, PCLOS, BPRNT or DPRNT) has been found to exist in the tape contents.
The designated variables name is not correct.
There are overlapping variables names.
A scaling command (G50 or G51) has been designated although scaling specifications are not provided.
A mirror image command (G50.1 or G51.1) has been designated although programmable mirror image specifications are not provided.
Corner chamfering or corner rounding I/II has been designated although such specifications are not provided.
The geometric command has been designated although geometric specifications are not provided.
The geometric setting format is wrong.
The polar coordinates command (G16) has been designated although such command specifications are not provided.
Absolute/incremental axis address conversion has been designated although such conversion specifications are not provided.
Program data input has been designated although such input specifications are not provided.
A move command other than that for reference-point return has been designated for the axis that was not returned to its reference point.
Second, third or fourth reference-point return has been designated although such reference-point returning specifications are not provided.
The program section under the mode of cross machining contains an incompatible G-code.
1. A G110 command is given under modal conditions not suitable to cross machining control.2. An unsuitable axis (since it cannot be used successfully for the counterpart) is specified for cross machining control.
An axis had not returned to the zero-point when the zero-point check command (G27) was executed.
The before-movement stroke check function (G22) has been designated although such function specifications are not provided.
This alarm message is displayed before execution of a movement block to indicate that the ending point of the axis movement designated in the block is likely to enter the forbidden area which has been designated using the before-movement stroke check function (G22).
1. An error occurred at the tape reader, or on the printer during macro printing.2. Calling of a program inside the host computer failed during Ethernet operation.3. The size of the output text file exceeded the value set for DPR8.When the cause is either No. 1 or 2 above, WNo., UNo. and BNo. will be displayed in the parentheses.When the cause is No. 3 above, the error type, detailed error code and β0β will be displayed in the parentheses.Error types 110: File open error, 111: File write error, 112: File size over error
The machining program file cannot be read.
The automatic tool-length measurement command (G37) has been designated although such measurement specifications are not provided.
The skip command (G31) has been designated although skip specifications are not provided.
A multi-step skip command (G31.1, G31.2 or G31.3) has been designated although such skip specifications are not provided.
A trouble has occurred with the software of auto program during the operation.
Argument P was not designated in the macro call command (G65, G66, G66.1).
1. An attempt has been made to call a MAZATROL program from an EIA/ISO program which was designated as a subprogram of MAZATROL program.2. A MAZATROL program has been specified using G65 command (subprogram call) in the manual program mode unit of the MAZATROL program.
β
1. In the thread cutting cycle command, designation for chamfering is incorrect.2. The current plane differs from the plane of chamfering.
The number of blocks in the shape data of the turning fixed-cycle (G270 through G273) exceeds 100 blocks.
The shape defined in the turning fixed-cycle (G270 through G273) is not the shape for correct cutting.
In the fixed-cycle (G290, G294), designation for the taper length or the taper height is incorrect.
β
The fixed-cycle command has been set in the program during the tool diameter offset (G41 or G42) modal status.
The G10 command has been designated although this command is not available with the system.
An unallowable L number has been designated during input of G10 program command.
Compensation numbers other than the number of sets permitted by the specifications have been designated during input of G10.
The G11 command has been designated although this command is not available with the system.
The spindle speed for the fixed cycle has not yet been set in the program.
An attempt has been made to machine the workpiece using the synchronous tapping method in spite of the spindle controller being an SE type.
The pitch or the number of threads has not been designated for the tapping cycle (G74 or G84) of the drilling fixed cycles.
The pitch or the number of threads designated for the tapping cycle (G74 or G84) of the drilling fixed cycles is wrong.
β
Corner chamfering/corner rounding has been designated although such specifications are not provided.
The block that is to succeed the corner rounding or corner chamfering command does not consist of a move command.
The length of the corner rounding or corner chamfering that has been designated in the corner rounding or chamfering command is larger than the distance of movement.
The movement distance designated in the next block is shorter than the length of the corner rounding or corner chamfering.
In the geometric command, the difference in angle between the two straight lines which intersect with each other is less than 1Β°.
The second block of the geometric command is an incremental command.
The second block of the geometric command is not given the linear command (G1).
In address designation of the geometric command, the angle in the first block, ending point coordinates and angle in the second block are incorrectly given.
A plane selection command (G17, G18 or G19) was given in the geometric command block.
An M independent command (M0, M1, M2 or M30) has been programmed in the same block as the G27 command.
An M independent command (M0, M1, M2 or M30) and the G29 command (start-position return) have been programmed in the same block.
The feedrate F has not been programmed in the G31 (skip) command block.
No axis settings are included in the automatic tool-length measurement block; or more than one axis setting have been made.
The H-code is in the same block as the automatic tool-length measurement command.
The H-code is not yet set for automatic tool-length measurement.
The signal of measuring-position arrival has been turned on before the tool reaches the area designated through either a D-code or the parameter for deceleration area βdβ; or the signal has not been turned on at all.
The skip command (G31) was given during tool diameter offset (G41 or G42).
The offset number that has been designated in the program is outside the range from 0 to 10.
An βH_β number is missing in the βG45.1H_β part of the EIA/ISO program.
The head type does not match to the face that has been designated in the program.
The head number that has been designated in the program is not registered on the HEAD OFFSET display.
Return to reference point has been designated during the surface-machining mode (G17.2 to G17.5) of the program.
An attempt has been made to execute a five-surface machining program when the five-surface machining option was not present.
An attempt has been made to execute the high-speed mode program when the high-speed mode option was not set.
An attempt has been made to execute the high-accuracy mode program when the high-accuracy mode option was not set.
The machine does not feature required options given below.
The designated tool cannot be used.
An attempt was made to start automatic operation although the setting at parameter F40, the operation selection parameter in tape mode, was β2β.
An attempt has been made to execute operation or tool path check of the program that contains G33 command (threading), although G33 option is not provided.
Inverse time feed program was attempted although inverse time feed option is not provided.
G-code of inhibition during G93 mode has been designated.
An attempt has been made to execute the three-dimensional coordinate conversion program in the absence of a three-dimensional coordinate conversion option.
An illegal G-code in the G68 mode has been designated.
A G68 command has been designated during the modal information that does not permit G68 to be set.
An attempt has been made to execute A-axis/B-axis automatic, sequential control or A-axis direct programming in the absence of an HV machining option.
An attempt has been made to call up a MAZATROL program from the EIA/ISO program in spite of the absence of a MAZATROL call option.
An attempt has been made to carry out block skip operations in spite of the absence of a block skip option.
An attempt has been made to use a G54.1 code in spite of the absence of a G54.1 (additional workpiece coordinate system) option.
An attempt has been made to use an additional workpiece coordinate system and a local workpiece coordinate system at the same time.
An attempt has been made to specify a spline interpolation command in spite of the absence of a spline interpolation option.
A corner chamfering/rounding command has been designated in the G0 or G33 mode.
An attempt has been made to perform synchronized tapping in spite of the absence of a synchronized tapping option.
During EIA/ISO program or MDI execution, data is not entered in the tool data item LENGTH or ACT-Ξ¦ (NOM-Ξ¦). (Only when the MAZATROL tool length and tool diameter are valid and parameter F84 bit 7 = 1)
The thread lead (thread pitch) that has been designated in the threading command data is not correct.
The ending point of the block immediately preceding the G06.2 command data, and the command data in the starting block of G06.2 do not match.
1. Restarting from the block containing the G06.2/G43.4 mode data has been attempted.2. During the control of cross machining, restarting the program containing another cross machining command has been attempted in the corresponding command sequence or subsequent.3. During the INTELLIGENT SAFETY SHIELD for automatic operation is valid, EIA modal restarting from the block preceded by the M660 block has been attempted.4. When 1 is set for bit 3 of parameter F93 or bit 7 of parameter F94 with a turning tool mounted, restarting has been attempted from the following block.A block in the G68 modeA block after G68 mode cancellation before execution of the X-/Z-axis positioning in the absolute data command5. Operation was restarted from a block specified in the orbit machining mode.6. Operation was restarted from a block between G124 and G125.7. Operation was restarted from a block specified in the cutting point command mode.
Manual handle or MDI interruption from the block containing the G06.2 mode data has been attempted.
1. The threshold value for load detection-based auto-pecking is not set to 0 or no such value is set.2. The parameter is not set appropriately.
The origin of the workpiece coordinate system does not lie on the axis of rotation of the table.
The program section under the mode of superposition control contains an incompatible G-code.
1. A command was given which is incompatible with the current mode of tool radius compensation for 5-axis machining.2. An arc having central angle of 180Β° or larger was specified in a circular interpolation command (G2/G3) in the tool radius compensation mode for 5-axis machining.3. A rotary axis was specified in a circular interpolation command (G2/G3) in the tool radius compensation mode for 5-axis machining.4. The 5-axis fairing function was specified in the tool radius compensation mode for 5-axis machining.
A command of tool radius compensation for five-axis machining has been designated under incompatible modal conditions.
The optional mirror image function for the opposed turret is not provided.
When bit 0 of parameter F329 (operation on specification of an undefined SMC data number) is set to β1β .1. An SMC data number outside the permissible range (0 to 20) was specified with G61.1P or G61.2P.2. An undefined SMC data number was specified with G61.1P or G61.2P.
When bit 0 of parameter F329 (operation on specification of an undefined SMC data number) is set to β0β:1. An SMC data number outside the permissible range (0 to 20) was specified with G61.1P or G61.2P.2. An undefined SMC data number was specified with G61.1P or G61.2P.
G148 (orbit machining mode ON) was specified although the machine does not feature the orbit machining option.
1. In the orbit machining mode, a G code that is not allowed in the mode was specified.2. An axis other than the X- or Z-axis was specified in the orbit machining mode.3. In the block specifying G148 (orbit machining mode ON), another G code or an MSTB command was specified.4. In the block specifying G149 (orbit machining mode OFF), another G code or an MSTB command was specified.5. A tool change command was specified in the orbit machining mode.6. G148 was specified without setting parameter K242 (axis name of the spindle to be rotated in orbit machining).
1. G148 (orbit machining mode ON) was specified in an operation mode where orbit machining is not allowed.2. G148 was specified in the G17 or G19 plane.3. The current Y-axis position differs from the Y-axis coordinate of the center of rotation specified with G148.4. G148 was specified in the second or subsequent control path.5. G149 was specified in the orbit machining mode while G40 was not in the modal state.
β
The parameter settings on the composition of controlled axes for the following modes are not correct: tool tip point control, inclined-surface machining, tool radius compensation for five-axis machining, and workpiece placement error correction.
1. A command of tool tip point control is given under incompatible modal conditions.2. A G43.5 command is given in spite of the selection of the workpiece coordinate system for programming.3. Under selection of the G-code system for turning machines, a command of tool tip point control is given with the parameter setting βF161 bit 1 = 0 (Geometric offset by logically shifting the coordinate system).β4. A command of circular interpolation is given under the mode of G43.5 or with the table coordinate system selected for programming.
An unavailable command (of preparatory or tool function) is given in the mode of tool tip point control.
A command that causes an incorrect tool axial direction vector was specified in the tool center point control or cutting point command mode.1. In the mode of G43.4/G43.8 with single-axis interpolation selected, commands were specified in such a way that the resulting tool path will not pass through the singular point although the sign of the angular position of the primary rotary axis is to be reversed.2. The command of the tool axis is not correct (as it will reverse the direction of the tool).3. With single-axis interpolation selected, the command in a single block will cause a motion through more than 180Β° on the rotary axis of linear type.
1. Arguments I, J, and K are specified in the mode of G43.4, or a command of rotary axis motion is given under G43.5.2. The code G49 is given in a block with other commands.3. A rotary axis is specified in the mode of circular interpolation.4. Under the modal condition of G43.4 or G43.5, an axis address other than those for the five controlled axes concerned (as specified in parameters K114, K115, K116, K121, and K125) was used in a motion command block.
The optional function for tool tip point control is not provided.
1. A command prohibited in the parallel axes composite control was specified.2. A command for the parallel axis was specified during the parallel axes composite control.3. Measurement was attempted during the parallel axes composite control.
1. Another G code was specified together with G124/G125 in the same block.2. G124 was specified in a mode in which parallel axes composite control is not permitted.
G124/G125 was specified while the parallel axes composite control function was disabled.
#3000 = n (alarm message) in the user macroprogram was executed. n β₯ 21
#3000 = 1 (alarm message) in the user macroprogram was executed.
#3000 = 2 (alarm message) in the user macroprogram was executed.
#3000 = 3 (alarm message) in the user macroprogram was executed.
#3000 = 4 (alarm message) in the user macroprogram was executed.
#3000 = 5 (alarm message) in the user macroprogram was executed.
#3000 = 6 (alarm message) in the user macroprogram was executed.
#3000 = 7 (alarm message) in the user macroprogram was executed.
#3000 = 8 (alarm message) in the user macroprogram was executed.
#3000 = 9 (alarm message) in the user macroprogram was executed.
#3000 = 10 (alarm message) in the user macroprogram was executed.
1. During execution of the coordinate measurement program, the touch sensor did not come into contact with the workpiece (the skip signal has not turned on) when the maximum feed distance permitted for the skipping speed has been exceeded.2. During execution of the tool measurement program, the tool did not come into contact with the measuring table (the skip signal did not turn on) when the maximum feed distance permitted for the skipping speed has been exceeded.3. #3000 = 11 (alarm message) in the user macroprogram was executed.
1. During execution of the coordinate measurement program, the touch sensor came into contact with the workpiece (the skip signal turned on) when the axes were being fed at other than the skipping speed.2. During execution of the tool measurement program, the tool came into contact with the measuring table (the skip signal turned on) when the axes were being fed at other than the skipping speed.3. #3000 = 12 (alarm message) in the user macroprogram was executed.
1. Correct signals were not output due to an error in the coordinate measurement program for the touch sensor, receiver, etc.2. #3000 = 13 (alarm message) in the user macroprogram was executed.3. An attempt has been made to perform MDI-MMS with the head not in its horizontal or vertical machining position.
#3000 = 14 (alarm message) in the user macroprogram was executed.
#3000 = 15 (alarm message) in the user macroprogram was executed.
#3000 = 16 (alarm message) in the user macroprogram was executed.
1. #3000 = 17 (alarm message) in the user macroprogram was executed.2. In a coordinate measurement unit (plane inclination C measurement), the C-axis inclination angle of the measurement plane is greater than the value set for parameter K221 (maximum C-axis angle variation).
1. #3000 = 18 (alarm message) in the user macroprogram was executed.2. The number of measurements in a coordinate measurement unit (plane inclination C measurement) has exceeded the value set for K222 (number of re-measurements).
#3000 = 19 (alarm message) in the user macroprogram was executed.
#3000 = 20 (alarm message) in the user macroprogram was executed.
No cause information available
A safety monitoring function error was detected. No. | Information | Cause --- | --- | --- 1 | | Safety watchdog error 2 | | Crosscheck error 3 | Function (*1) | Safety system internal processing error 4 | | Safety parameter saving memory error 1 5 | | Safety parameter saving memory error 2 6 | | Safety initial processing time-out 7 | Axis name | NC-DRV safety initial communication error 8 | Unit information | Safety I/O initial processing time-out *1 Function | Function name --- | --- 0001 | Safety limit speed monitoring (SLS) 0002 | Safety limit position monitoring (SLP) 0003 | Safety speed monitoring (SSM) 0004 | Safety cam (SCA) 0005 | Safety stop monitoring (SOS) 0006 | Safety stop 1 (SS1) 0007 | Safety stop 2 (SS2) 0008 | Safety torque stop (STO) 0009 | Safety brake control (SBC) 000A | Diagnosis function 000B | Safety related I/O monitoring
A safety monitoring function error was detected. No. | Cause --- | --- 1 | Encoder error 2 | Abnormality detected in STO circuit diagnosis 3 | Abnormality detected in SBC circuit diagnosis 4 | NC-DRV safety communication error 5 | Excess axis movement amount during power off
A safety monitoring function error was detected. No. | Information | Cause --- | --- | --- 1 | Unit information | Slave station communication error 1 2 | Unit information | Slave station communication error 2 3 | Unit information | Slave station communication error 3 4 | Unit information | Slave station data verification error 5 | Unit information | Output OFF check error 6 | Unit information | Output signal crosscheck error 7 | Unit information | Transmission crosscheck error 8 | Unit information | Reception crosscheck error 9 | Unit information | Host station communication error 1 10 | Unit information | Host station communication error 2 11 | Unit information | Host station communication error 3 12 | Unit information | Drive safety reception crosscheck error 13 | Factor (*1) | User safety sequence 1 illegal 14 | Factor (*1) | User safety sequence 2 illegal 15 | Unit information | Output signal crosscheck error *1 Factor | Cause --- | --- 0 Γ 1200 | CRC error occurred. The user safety sequence can be faulty. 0 Γ 1300 | File system version mismatch occurred. 0 Γ 2100 | Label duplication error occurred. 0 Γ 2600 | Illegal execution of RET instruction 1. A RET instruction could not have been executed at the branch destination of a CALL instruction. 2. A RET instruction could have been been executed although a CALL instruction was not executed. 0 Γ 2700 | Ladder code error An abnormality was detected with the data in the sequence program to be executed. 1. An unusable PLC instruction could be used. 2. A sequence program stored in the internal ROM could be corrupted. 0 Γ 2900 | Execution area over The total number of steps of the ladder to be executed could be larger than the size of PLC processor execution area. 0 Γ 8000 | Exceptional software interruption (BCD instruction error) occurred. With a BCD or DBCD instruction, BCD conversion could be attempted for a BIN value outside the allowable input range. 0 Γ 8100 | Exceptional software interruption (BIN instruction error) occurred. With a BIN or DBIN instruction, BIN conversion could be attempted for a BCD value outside the allowable input range. 0 Γ 8200 | Exceptional software interruption (bus error) occurred. 0 Γ 8300 | Exceptional software interruption (non-installed instruction error) occurred. 0 Γ 8400 | Exceptional software interruption (instruction format error) occurred. 0 Γ 8500 | Exceptional software interruption (instruction bus error) occurred. 0 Γ 8600 | Exceptional software interruption (CALL/RET instruction error) occurred. 0 Γ 8700 | Exceptional software interruption (memory area error) occurred. 0 Γ 8800 | Exceptional software interruption (ASYNC BUS error) occurred.
A safety monitoring function error was detected. No. | Information | Cause --- | --- | --- 1 | - | Simultaneous execution of safety monitoring and smart safety monitoring impossible 2 | Connection channel | Safety I/O device connection impossible 3 | Connection channel | Safety I/O impossible Incorrect safety I/O connection 4 | - | Safety I/O impossible No safety I/O 5 | - | Safety PLC not written 6 | Channel number | NC-DRV safety communication impossible 7 | Emergency stop device number | Illegal emergency stop device specification 9 | - | Illegal setting of safety I/O device allocation parameter
A safety monitoring function error was detected. No. | Cause --- | --- 1 | SLS speed error 2 | SLS deceleration error 3 | SLP position error 4 | SOS speed error 5 | SOS position deviation error 6 | SOS movement amount error 7 | SS1 deceleration error 8 | SS2 deceleration error
A safety monitoring function error was detected. No. | Cause --- | --- 1 | Stopped due to safety external emergency stop function The emergency stop signal is off when the safety external emergency stop function is valid.
Abnormal operation of the safety circuit inside the drive unit has been detected.
A safety monitoring function error was detected. No. | Cause --- | --- 1 | SSM hysteresis width setting error SSM hysteresis width is larger than SSM speed. 2 | Safety absolute position not established 1. The safety absolute position has not been established even once after making valid SLP/SCA. 2. In the encoder diagnosis performed while SLP/SCA power is off, there is a positional offset between the position saved when the power was turned off and the position restored when the power was turned on.
A safety monitoring function error was detected. No. | Information | Cause --- | --- | --- 1 | Factor (*1) | SBT start impossible | | When making the SBT start signal valid, the test start conditions are not met. 2 | Axis name | SBT warning 1 | | In external brake test pattern 1, axis movement amount exceeded the permissible value. 5 | Axis name | SBT warning 4 | | In motor brake test pattern 1, axis movement amount exceeded the permissible value. 6 | Axis name | SBT warning 5 | | In motor brake test pattern 2, axis movement amount exceeded the permissible value. 7 | Axis name | SBT warning 6 | | In motor brake test pattern 3, axis movement amount exceeded the permissible value. *1 Factor | Description --- | --- 0001 | System during automatic operation existing 0002 | No in the in-position state 0003 | In the servo off state 0004 | In the current limited state 0005 | Slave axis in synchronous control 0006 | In the superimposition control state 0007 | In the arbitrary axis exchanged control state 0008 | In the mixed control state 0009 | SBT parameter error 000A | Reference point not established 000B | Corresponding to the SBT exclusive conditions 000C | Slave axis SBT invalid 000D | Slave axis SBT start impossible 000E | In the slave axis independent control method
A safety monitoring function error was detected. No. | Cause --- | --- 1 | In the PLC safe stop state The safe stop 1 request signal or the safe torque stop request signal of the PLC input signal is off.
A safety monitoring function error was detected. No. | Cause --- | --- 1 | 24-hour ON state continuation warning The output signal of the safety I/O device remained ON for more than 24 hours. The relating unit No., RIO system and signal bit are displayed.
A safety monitoring function error was detected.
Interference occurs between <Interfering section 1> and <Interfering section 2>.
Interference occurs between <Interfering section 1> and <Interfering section 2>.
The 3D interference check process cannot be performed within a proper time.
The rapid feed override value set up on the operating panel is β0β.
Machine operation has been stopped because of a delay in interference check process.
If the processing load of the PC is too high, it may not be possible to update the model properly. A press of the RESET key returns operation to a normal state, thus allowing interference checks to be performed properly. 1. Creation of the model has failed. 2. The interference check process has not been performed properly. 3. An NC-PC communications error (time-out error) has occurred. 4. An illegal access has been detected in processing at the NC side. 5. Preparation of the safety shield has not completed normally because an alarm occurred during preparation of the safety shield. * For causes 1 to 4, the alarm No. given as the argument is not effective.
1. Manual tool measurement results cannot be calculated because of tool data items remaining blank. 2. The βtool lengthβ or βtool diameter (nominal diameter)β of the tool was not set in the tool data when executing an MDI program. (MAZATROL tool length and tool diameter are enabled and bit 7 of parameter F84 is set to β1β.)
The automatic operation key was pressed during tape operation.
The tool length input range has been overstepped as a result of tool measurement.
The spindle removal function was activated during spindle operation.
Commands that involve movement of axes exceeding the maximum number of simultaneously controllable axes have been specified.
The Tx-/Ty-/Tz-axis was selected in the manual mode while in the conditions described below. Or, the Tx-/Ty-/Tz-axis was selected during manual handle pulse interruption. No. | Cause --- | --- 0 Γ 00000001 | The axis number specified for K114 (or K226) as the horizontal axis of the orthogonal coordinate system does not exist in the control path. Or, the axis is not a linear axis. 0 Γ 00000002 | The axis number specified for K115 (or K227) as the vertical axis of the orthogonal coordinate system does not exist in the control path. Or, the axis is not a linear axis. 0 Γ 00000004 | The axis number specified for K116 (or K228) as the height axis of the orthogonal coordinate system does not exist in the control path. Or, the axis is not a linear axis. 0 Γ 00000008 | The axis number specified for K121 (or K230) as the first rotary axis does not exist in the control path. Or, the axis is not a rotary axis. 0 Γ 00000010 | The axis number specified for K125 (or K234) as the second rotary axis does not exist in the control path. Or, the axis is not a rotary axis. 0 Γ 00000020 | The first digit (direction of the first rotary axis) of the value specified for K117 (or K229) as the direction of rotation of the rotary axis is incorrect. 0 Γ 00000040 | The second digit (direction of the second rotary axis) of the value specified for K117 (or K229) as the direction of rotation of the rotary axis is incorrect. 0 Γ 00000080 | The machine type set for K113 (or K225) is incorrect.
Machine interference has been detected with the NC axis active in automatic operation mode.
The operations that make interference checking impossible were performed during automatic operation when the INTELLIGENT SAFETY SHIELD function was valid. The values of βCauseβ denote the causes below. 1: After an EIA modal search under the invalid status of the INTELLIGENT SAFETY SHIELD in automatic operation mode, the Automatic Operation INTELLIGENT SAFETY SHIELD function was made valid in an attempt to start automatic operation. 2: Following completion of the EIA modal search, manual operation mode was selected and after the axis was moved to a position different from that before the search, memory mode was reselected and a restart operation was attempted. 3: An attempt was made to start the MDI operation at the same time for both the upper and the lower turret.
Starting either the hard disk, Ethernet, IC card, or tape operation was attempted when the Automatic Operation INTELLIGENT SAFETY SHIELD function was valid.
1. Calculation for interference checking during automatic operation is in progress. 2. An NC alarm or PLC alarm occurs at the pre-read block. Or an M code is not completed at the pre-read block. When the cause is No. 1 above, nothing will be displayed in parentheses. When the cause is No. 2 above, contributing factors 1, 2 and 3 will be displayed in the parentheses.
The INTELLIGENT SAFETY SHIELD for automatic operation has been canceled. 1. With the INTELLIGENT SAFETY SHIELD being valid for automatic operation, a command which is not compatible with interference check was executed. 2. With the INTELLIGENT SAFETY SHIELD being valid for automatic operation, an attempt was made to start a program stored in the storage areas for Hard Disk operation, Ethernet operation, and IC Card operation, or a program prepared for Tape operation.
With the INTELLIGENT SAFETY SHIELD being valid for automatic operation, the feed-overriding value has been changed.
An attempt was made to change the part count value manually during automatic operation with the SAFETY SHIELD function set valid.
The amount of space error compensation has exceeded the upper limit.
The space error compensation function is not operating properly.
1. The chopping axis is in the servo-off or removed status. 2. The chopping axis is the rotating axis, basic axis or tilting axis under tilt control, or tandem axis. 3. The top dead point and the bottom dead point are the same. 4. The chopping axis has not been returned to its zero point. 5. An attempt was made to start chopping when the chopping axis is selected for the axis to control manually. 6. The chopping feed rate is zero. 7. An attempt was made to change the chopping axis during chopping. 8. An attempt was made in the replay mode of the fixed offset method to use an offset number of which record has not been written. 9. An M-code command for axis movement is issued during chopping.
Manual interrupt or zero-point return mode for the chopping axis is selected during chopping.
The chopping override value is zero.
The work spindle speed exceeded the clamp speed during hobbing.
The machine has been operated using a spare tool with the INTELLIGENT SAFETY SHIELD function while automatic operation was enabled.
A material interference check cannot be carried out while the modal restarting process of the EIA/ISO program is in progress.
With parameter settings of F156 bit0 = 0 and F156 bit1 = 1, a cutting command that incorporates a rotary axis travel was executed while one of the following interpolation modes was active. β’ With the C-/U-axis Interpolation other than G7.1 (cylindrical interpolation) or G12.1 (polar coordinate interpolation) active β’ With the B-axis Interpolation active Add the material model cutting invalid M-code in the program before starting the operation. It is also possible to select whether the operation should be continued or stopped by an alarm by using the following parameter settings. 0 | 1 --- | --- F156 bit0 | Continue operation with material cutting enabled only at the end position. F156 bit1 | Continue operation with material cutting disabled. According to the setting of F156 bit1 | Stop with an alarm
1. When the cutting point control mode was valid, automatic operation was restarted after manual interruption from a position that differs from the position where manual interruption was called. 2. When the cutting point command function is valid, automatic operation was restarted after manual interruption from a rotary axis position that differs from the rotary axis position where manual interruption was called. 3. When the cutting point command function is valid, automatic operation handle interruption or MDI interruption was performed. 4. When the cutting point command function is valid, the mode was changed to the zero-point return mode.
User macro interruption occurred in the block in which the tool path passes a singular point.
1. G149 was specified without specifying a rotation stop M code during orbit machining. 2. G148 (orbit machining mode ON) was specified while the mill spindle was rotating. 3. G148 was specified for a machine that does not feature a mill spindle. 4. A cross machining command was specified while in the orbit machining mode. 5. Simplified synchronization control was attempted while in the orbit machining mode. 6. Superimposition axis control was attempted while in the orbit machining mode. 7. Orbit machining was attempted during inclined-axis control.
1. The MDI mode was selected during orbit machining. 2. The manual operation mode was selected during orbit machining.
The feedrate/speed of any of the X-/Y-/Z-axis and mill spindle was clamped at the value set for parameter M1, M67 or M68.
1. The position of the fundamental axis or parallel axis was outside the movement range upon specifying G124. 2. The fundamental axis or parallel axis has moved beyond the specified movement range in the G124 mode.
Any of the following operations was attempted while executing the engraving function. 1. Manual interruption 2. Manual pulse handle interruption 3. MDI interruption
During manual tool measurement (with TOOL EYE), the sensor was turned ON while multiple measurement axes (*) were moving. * The measurement axes vary depending on the machine model.
During manual tool measurement (with TOOL EYE), the sensor was turned ON without specifying the destination for writing the tool offset for tool offset measurement.
When an M code for canceling the disabled status of the automatic operation safety shield is specified, operation stops until synchronization for restarting the interference check is completed. Operation restarts when the synchronization has completed.
An automatic door open command (M256) was issued while the spindle was rotating.
Abnormality has been detected at the servo amplifier of the servo-driven automatic door.
The open/close speed of the servo-driven automatic door has exceeded the set value.
The current value of the servo-driven automatic door has exceeded the set value.
The tool has not been clamped properly in the milling spindle.
The tool has not been clamped properly in the milling spindle.
Three hours have elapsed after the occurrence of a line filter clogging alarm.
Clogging of the line filter was detected.
Three hours have elapsed after the occurrence of a high-pressure line filter clogging alarm.
Clogging of the high-pressure line filter was detected.
The type of chucking (internal/external chucking) was switched while the chuck was not open.
A turning spindle orientation command was specified in the C-axis mode.
Orientation of the mill spindle or turning spindle, or C-axis connection was attempted in the manual operation mode with the front door open.
The measurement result is abnormal.
An axis movement key was pressed while the spindle was rotating.
A B-axis rotation command was specified while the Z-axis was near the ATC area.
A B-axis rotation command was specified with the machine setup switch set at the β0β (OFF) position and the front door open. A B-axis rotation command was specified with the LBB clamper extended.
The cycle start button was pressed while updating the 3D model.
Retraction of the tailstock was attempted with [TAIL RETRACT ENABLE] in the machine menu deselected (white).
A tailstock thrust setting M code was specified while the spindle was rotating.
The tailstock is pressed against the workpiece.
[HANDLE INTERRUPT] was tapped during ATC operation.
With a shaping specification machine, a shaping axis connection command was specified with the front door open.
Something is wrong with the coolant chiller unit.
[ATC RECOVERY MODE] was selected (blue) while ATC recovery mode selection is not possible.
This alarm message is displayed when the ATC recovery mode is selected.
This alarm message is displayed when automatic ATC recovery is finished.
The turning spindle speed limit of 500 min-1 when using the 7-t tailstock in the high-pressure mode has been exceeded more than 300 times.
The coolant temperature sensor or ambient temperature sensor is faulty.
The turning spindle speed limit of 500 min-1 when using the 7-t tailstock in the high-pressure mode was exceeded.
A freeze alarm was generated due to low coolant temperature.
Temperature or vibration of the mill spindle has exceeded the threshold value for 10 sec. continuously.
An internal trouble has occurred in the system.
Trouble has occurred in opening a file from the hard disk.
Trouble has occurred in reading a file on the hard disk.
Trouble has occurred in writing a file on the hard disk.
It was attempted to edit jaw shape data of the machining program currently selected.
The size of the loaded file is not correct.
Memory size currently available is too small.
Creating a file and folder on the hard disk was not successful.
Data transfer to the NC was not successful.
The designated function is not available for a program of initial-point scheme (ONLY MILL).
The designated function is not available for a program of workpiece scheme (MILL & TURN) with WPC setting.
The designated function is not available for a program of workpiece scheme (MILL & TURN) with Z-offset setting.
The designated function is not available for the G-code system selected by the F30 parameter.
The designated function is not available for the current operation mode or on the current display.
Storing a program on the hard disk was not successful.
The LENGTH A item of the tool is set to zero (0).
The tool currently indexed on the turret is not appropriate.
The setting in a parameter is not correct.
The current selection of the headstock to which the lower turret is subordinate is not correct.
The size of the file is too large for new data to be written in it.
No cause information available
Creating the data for turret-by-turret display of program layout was not successful.
Since the program has not yet undergone tool path check, the TOOL DATA display (tool layout mode) cannot perform calculations for indicating the spare tools to be additionally provided for the machining operation with the program.
In the program-listing mode, [BARRIER INFORM.] has been tapped without any barrier data being registered.
The setup data are not correct.
The current process has no program layout information provided.
3D remodeling of the workpiece, fixture, or tool has failed.
A long boring bar was assigned to a position other than the special pocket for long boring bars while operating [LAYOUT FINISH] on the TOOL DATA display (tool layout mode).
Tool setup auto-setting for a tool not capable of using the tool setup auto-setting function (e.g., a magazine tool or a tool facing the No. 1 turning spindle) has been attempted on the TOOL DATA display.
1. This alarm indicates that the machine-operating program and the program selected on the PROGRAM (MAZATROL) display differ during execution of the workpiece transfer storage function or the program selected on the PROGRAM (MAZATROL) display differ during execution of the workpiece transfer storage function on the PROGRAM (MAZATROL) display. 2. When the directory selection function was enabled (parameter US1 bit 4 = 1) or the project function was enabled (parameter US1 bit 5 = 1), a work number that had the same name as the work number to be executed in automatic operation from the WORK No. SELECT window but was in a different operation area was selected for WORK No. in the COMPARISON STOP window or for SUB PROG. No. in the RESTART (EIA/ISO) window.
The tool for which the reference tool length was set has not been found during automatic tool length setting.
The tool model to be used as a reference has not been selected during tool model copying, erasing, or renaming.
A registered tool name has been specified during tool model copying or renaming.
When setting the PROGRAM LAYOUT display from the MAZATROL program was attempted, the layout of program data up to the first end unit has been displayed since an end unit was present at a position previous to the cursor.
Setting the 3D MONITOR display has been attempted during automatic operation mode.
A program of a different program type has been specified during MAZATROL program copying.
Transferring the same program as the automatic operation program, from the backup area to the standard area, has been attempted.
[SETUP DATA] has been tapped in the program listing mode when there was no registered setup data.
Changing a unit has been attempted when a unit change in the MAZATROL program was prohibited. β’ It is not allowed to change a unit for which data other than the unit name has been set up. β’ It is not allowed to change a unit if the current machining section is not selectable for the new unit (e.g., a unit for which an outside-diametral section has been selected as the machining section cannot be changed to a turning-drilling unit).
Although moving tool data from the magazine tool list to the stored-tool list has been attempted on the TOOL DATA display (tool layout mode), an ID number has not been set up for the corresponding tool.
The corresponding file does not exist during file loading on the MAINTENANCE CHECK display.
Registering an illegal tool in tool data has been attempted.
NC data backup has been aborted.
Assigning a priority number to the roughing tool on the PROGRAM LAYOUT display has been attempted, but the priority numbers required exceed 99. The priority number must range from 1 to 99. Otherwise, this alarm will occur.
Assigning a priority number to the roughing tool on the PROGRAM LAYOUT display has been attempted, but since simultaneous machining is specified in the program and the same simultaneous machining number is specified for both roughing and finishing. Roughing cannot be prioritized with the simultaneous machining number ignored.
A work number change has been attempted in single-process mode.
The NC data restore process has been aborted.
The tool length input range has been overstepped as a result of tool measurement.
This alarm indicates that during hard-disk program transfer to the program storage area (NC memory), as in a power-on status, lack of the necessary NC memory space has been detected or the program storage capacity limit exceeded. If AREA = 1β¦β¦..indicates alarm during program transfer from the standard area to the NC memory If AREA = 2β¦β¦..indicates alarm during machine manufacturer macroprogram transfer to the NC memory If AREA = 3β¦β¦..indicates alarm during GL pattern file transfer to the NC memory
An attempt has been made to use [TEACH] for a WPC unit with the lower turret selected.
Tip position memorization was attempted with the tilting table at other than the 0Β° position.
The spindle condition check function judged that the spindle was in an alarm state.
Editing or setting of a machining program, tool data, or other data was attempted while saving the backup data.
Editing or setting of a machining program, tool data, or other data was attempted while restoring from the backup data.
Invalid characters have been used in the manufacturer name in an attempt to add a tool part model.
Invalid characters have been used in the model number in an attempt to add a tool part model.
Editing or deleting the tool part model that the manufacturer created has been attempted.
[OP.TOOL PATH] was tapped in the tape operation mode or without selecting a program for the operation.
Calling up the VIRTUAL MACHINING display was attempted during automatic operation (when the INTELLIGENT SAFETY SHIELD function in automatic operation mode was valid).
Importing the CAD tool model has failed.
An attempt to display the saved data was made during condition check operation.
Manual handle pulse interruption was attempted during balance cutting.
Dismounting of a drive where no USB device is connected was attempted on the DATA I/O display.
A Non-existent attachment number was specified in the MDI mode.
While the input error prevention function was enabled, the input data or variation of tool wear offset exceeded the parameter setting range.
Note : β1 : Data in the error file for space error compensation to be transferred to the NC unit does not match the machine configuration. β2 : Error components in the error file for space error compensation have exceeded the specification (single direction: 128 points, both directions: 64 points). β3 : Data in the error file for space error compensation is illegal.
The G code macro call output from the add-in EIA window has exceeded 248 characters.
[RE-EDIT] has been tapped when the block in the cursor position cannot be edited in the EIA/ISO program. 1. Unsuitable G code or unnecessary address for add-in EIA function is included in the block in the cursor position. 2. A comment is located toward the top of the program from the block of G code macro call. 3. The block for re-editing exceeds 248 characters.
The restart 2 non-modal function setting was attempted in a mode other than the memory operation or hard disk operation mode.
Measurement using the INTELLIGENT BALANCE ANALYZER function did not complete normally.
The tool measurement conditions on the TOOL DATA display are not satisfied.
A process for a head differing from the selected head has been selected in the SELECT PROCESS window for the restart or single process operation. (Only for MULTIPLEX series)
With nine messages locked, an attempt to lock a 10th message was made.
The allowable operation range is restricted by the data guard function. No. | Cause --- | --- 0 | A user having the authority level lower than RANK β1β attempted to change the custom setting. 1 to 8 | The access authority level is lower than the level required for changing the data. 999 | Deletion of a user failed.
The input user name or password is incorrect. No. | Cause --- | --- 0 | The user name or password set at the input and display filed for switching a user is incorrect. 1 | The password set at the input and display filed for changing a password is incorrect. 2 | The user name or password set at the input and display filed for adding a user is incorrect.
A user name is not selected in account management operation with Data Guard. No. | Cause --- | --- 1 | A user name is not selected at the input and display field for changing a password. 3 | A user name is not selected at the input and display field for deleting a user.
Two passwords input in account management operation with Data Guard do not match. No. | Cause --- | --- 1 | Mismatch of two passwords input at the input and display field for changing a password. 2 | Mismatch of two passwords input at the input and display field for adding a user.
A character string input in the account management operation by Data Guard includes illegal characters. No. | Cause --- | --- 1 | A character string input at the input and display field for changing a password includes illegal characters. 2 | A character string input at the input and display field for adding a user includes illegal characters.
A user name input in account management operation by Data Guard already exists. No. | Cause --- | --- 2 | A user name input at the input and display field for adding a user already exists.
In Data Guard account management operation, RANK is not selected. No. | Cause --- | --- 2 | In the input and display field for adding a user, RANK is not selected.
An attempt was made to register more than 50 users in Data Guard account management operation. No. | Cause --- | --- 2 | An attempt was made to register more than 50 users at the input and display field for adding a user.
The confirmation code input in Data Guard account management operation is incorrect. No. | Cause --- | --- 3 | Mismatch of the confirmation code, input at the input and display field for deleting a user, with ββ9999β.
SMC data operation is performed while the SMC data editing is not allowed or for the data items that cannot be edited. No. | Cause --- | --- 0 | The edit menu was selected although the SMC data was not selected. 1 | An attempt was made to edit SMC No. 0. 2 | An attempt was made to edit the locked SMC data. Or, the locked SMC data is specified as the destination of transfer. 3 | An attempt was made to edit the SMC data currently used in operation. Or, the SMC data currently used in operation was specified as the destination of transfer. 4 | The βSMC data additionβ operation was performed by selecting the SMC data that is already registered.
The SMC data that has not been set is specified in the SMC data selection window.
The INTELLIGENT THERMAL SHIELD parameters have not been set.
ATC mode ID number 5 has been set in the main program.
The position of W-axis is not specified in the index unit preceding the machining unit.
The main MAZATROL program of the initial-point scheme has been executed under the setting of the machine model with MAZATROL-based control of the lower turret.
There is a mismatch in workpiece scheme data settings between the machining direction for index unit POS-B and the machining direction for the machining section of the lower-turret milling tool.
Either lower-turret turning unit, the measuring unit, the manual program mode unit, or subprogram EIA call has been executed with MIRROR of the WPC shift unit made valid in a program of the workpiece scheme.
The infeed angle or relief angle during cutting is 0Β° or less.
The M-SP ROT. item (which is indispensable for executing a MAZATROL program when K102 bit 6 = 1) remains unset on the TOOL DATA display.
When table selection is valid (parameter D106 bit 4 = 1), no table selection unit is set before the WPC, WPC shift or indexing unit.
A basic coordinates sytem unit (WPC) is set in the program section for the two-workpiece machining sequence.
Machining units in the two-workpiece machining section are not preceded by an index unit.
Machining units after the two-workpiece machining section are not preceded by an index unit.
Machining units after the two-workpiece machining section are not preceded by a head selection unit.
Machining units in the two-workpiece machining section are not preceded by a head selection unit.
Index unit is set while NO USE is selected for ROT. AXIS in table selection unit on the machine not equipped with spindle head of swiveling type (parameter BA48 is set to 0).
The ROT.CENTER setting in the table selection unit does not match the TABLE-CT. setting in the FRM unit.
An attempt was made to execute the smooth chamfering program although the smooth chamfering function is not provided.
1. An attempt was made to execute the smooth chamfering program with the machine type with which the smooth chamfering function is not available.2. An attempt was made to execute the smooth chamfering program when the B-axis angle is other than +90Β° in the end milling slot unit of WPC workpiece scheme.3. An attempt was made to execute the smooth chamfering program when the machining face is other than cylindrical surface in the C-axis point machining unit of WPC workpiece scheme.4. An attempt was made to execute the smooth chamfering program when HOLE-DEP is set to a value other than 0 in the chamfering tool sequence for point machining.5. An attempt was made to execute the smooth chamfering program when the cylinder radius is set to 0 or blank in the end milling slot unit of WPC workpiece scheme.6. An attempt was made to execute the smooth chamfering program when CHMF is set to 0 or blank in the end milling slot unit or point machining unit.
β
In the selection of the approach scheme for INTELLIGENT POCKET MILLING (IPM), βTAPERβ or βPECKINGβ was selected.
β
No index unit is set after 5-face machining.
No WPC unit is set after 5-face machining.
TPC relay points are set for the subprogram called from the 5-face machining unit.
The subprogram called from the 5-face machining unit contains a unit that cannot be specified during 5-face machining.1. 5-face machining unit2. Face definition unit3. Pallet change unit4. Process end unit5. MMS unit6. Tool measurement unit7. Workpiece measurement unit8. Manual program unit
The attachment number currently mounted and that set in the 5-face machining differ.
Standard machining other than 5-face machining was attempted while the attachment was mounted.
Program editing was attempted after editing the layout.
For the reciprocating grooving pattern, any of the conditions indicated below is met.1. The value βtool nose width + 2 Γ (finishing allowance)β is larger than the value βgroove width β tool load avoidance distance (TC156)β .2. The value β2 Γ nose Rβ is larger than the value βgroove width β tool load avoidance distance (TC156)β .3. The value βtool nose width β 2 Γ nose Rβ is larger than the value βgroove width β rear corner Γ factor β tool load avoidance distance (TC156)β .4. The tool load avoidance distance (TC156) is larger than the depth of cut.
In intelligent pocket milling (IPM), the engage angle is too large for the tool nose R.
Uncut amount increases if corner rounding path is automatically inserted in INTELLIGENT POCKET MILLING (IPM).
In intelligent pocket milling (IPM), a tool path that has a constant engage angle cannot be generated.
A machining face where machining is not possible is specified in the C-axis machining unit.
The G-command has been set in the block containing a time constant changeover/cancellation command.The time constant changeover/cancellation command has been set in the fixed cycle.The time constant changeover/cancellation command has been set during MAZATROL programmed simultaneous machining or MAZATROL programmed β2 workpieceβ machining.
The G10 command has been set during time constant changeover (non-M880 mode).
1. The G12.1 command is set when the current position of the No. 1 axis (linear axis) on the plane is present on the negative side.2. The No. 2 axis (rotational axis) on the plane is not a rotating type of rotational axis.
A G-code whose usage for the secondary spindle is prohibited has been entered when the secondary spindle high-accuracy index option was valid.
With F165 bit 6 = 1 (Z-offset data presence check for EIA automatic operation), Z-offset value was missing in setup data when the G53.5 command (initial G53.5 included) was entered for EIA automatic operation.
Executing the program has been attempted despite an inclined-surface machining option being absent.
A command (G-command or T-command) that cannot be used for inclined-surface machining has been specified during inclined-surface machining.
1. Inclined-surface machining has been specified in the mode that prohibits the specification of inclined-surface machining.2. A G68.4 command (for incremental coordinate system establishment) was given with the inclined-surface machining mode being cancelled.
Inclined-surface machining has been specified in the mode that prohibits the specification of tool axial control.
The inclined-surface machining command address is wrong.
The inclined surface cannot be defined with the specified data.
βTool length correction in the tool axial directionβ has been specified in the mode that does not permit that command.
An incorrect command (such as a G-command or a T-command) has been entered during βTool length correction in the tool axial directionβ.
The workpiece placement error correction option is not present.
An incorrect command (such as a G-command or a T-command) has been entered during the workpiece placement error correction.
The workpiece placement error correction has been specified in the mode that does not permit the workpiece placement error correction.
The mode existing during plane selection (with G18.2/G18.3/G18.4) for turning, or during plane cancellation (with G18.1) for turning is not valid.
An incorrect command has been specified during the plane selection (with G18.2/G18.3/G18.4) for turning.
An invalid cutting command was issued for the material model when interference checking of the material model was valid.
1. The program of either the hard disk operation or Ethernet operation area was specified as subprogram when automatic operation interference check was valid.2. The program to be called up as a subprogram is not registered in the memory.
1. Such a command has been assigned that the travel on a rotational axis exceeds an angle of 180Β° before or after the correction of the tool direction.2. The distance of correcting motion on the primary or secondary rotational axis for workpiece placement error correction is beyond the limit particularly set for MAZATROL programs.
Writing into a write-protected system variable has been attempted.
β
The workpiece setup error correction command has been issued in a MAZATROL program under inadequate conditions.
An attempt was made to change the part count data by changing the system variables (#3901 and #3902) during automatic operation with the SAFETY SHIELD function set valid.
M711 to M714 was specified in the manual program unit, TPC, or tool sequence.
A G-code command that cannot be used for the head indexing axis has been specified.
The angular value given for indexing the head cannot be divided by the L17 parameter setting (minimum angle of head index command).
β
Tool tip point control or high-speed smoothing control is made valid in the G61.2 mode when the 5-axis spline interpolation option is not provided.
The 5-axis spline interpolation mode is made valid during the uniaxial rotation interpolation (when bit 3 of parameter F85 is set to 0).
1. The top dead point and the bottom dead point are the same.2. The chopping feed rate command specifies zero.3. The chopping command is given in the chopping command inhibiting mode.4. An illegal value (other than 0 to 2) is set for the chopping offset method.5. An illegal value (other than 0 to 7) is set for the chopping offset number.6. The chopping record M-code is issued when the offset update method is selected.7. An overflow occurs when writing the chopping speed value.
A command that is inhibited during chopping is issued.
Tool length compensation G43P3 is issued under any of the following conditions.1. Pinch cut or Y-axis turning option is invalid.2. The machine is not equipped with tool length C compensation, or tool length C compensation is made invalid. (Parameter BA131 bit 1 = 0)3. MAZATROL tool length is invalid. (Parameter F93 bit 3 = 0)4. Tool length A, B or C is not set for the current tool in MAZATROL tool data.
1. The X-, Y- or Z-axis movement command is issued before the head rotary axis (B-axis) is turned to the 90-degree position after the tool length compensation G43P3 command was issued (or after tool change to a tool with tool length C setting).2. A G-code command that is prohibited in the tool length compensation G43P3 mode is issued.
1. Before reading the program for the control path in which the alarm occurred, a process was executed in response to a command specified in another control path.2. Access to the program file used for the hard disk or Ethernet operation did not complete within the preset time.
1. In the mode in which a cutting point command cannot be specified, a cutting point command was specified.2. A cutting point command was specified although a workpiece coordinate system was selected as the coordinate system for programming.3. A cutting point command was specified although the shape offset is processed by sifting the coordinates (F161 bit1 = 0).4. A circular interpolation command was specified although cutting point command mode or a table coordinate system was selected.
In the cutting point command mode, an unusable command was specified.
1. In the G43.8 mode, an I/J/K address was specified or in the G43.9 mode, an address of a rotary axis was specified.2. In a block that contains a G49 command, other commands were specified.3. A rotary axis command was specified in circular interpolation mode.4. In the G43.8 or G43.9 mode, an axis feed command of other than the controllable axes (axes specified with K114, K115, K116, K121 and K125) was specified.5. For an argument of a P command, a value other than 0, 1 and 2 was specified.
An attempt was made to execute a program although the cutting point control function is not selected.
An attempt was made to execute a program although the corner smoothing control function option is not selected.
An attempt was made to execute a program although the variable acceleration control function option is not selected.
An axis assigned with a 2-character axis name was specified with an illegal G code.
Parameter setting is incorrect for an axis assigned with a 2-character axis name.
Parameter setting is incorrect for an axis assigned with a 2-character axis name.
G02.2 or G03.2 was specified while the machine was not equipped with the involute interpolation option.
In the involute interpolation mode, an unusable command was specified.
An involute command was specified in a modal status in which involute commands cannot be used.
1. Any of the addresses I, J, K and R is omitted.2. 0 was specified for all addresses I, J and K.3. 0 was specified for address R.4. An address I, J or K other than for the selected plane was specified.
A 5-axis configuration parameter selection command (M641/M642) was specified although the machine was not equipped with the 5-axis machining multiple axis sets selection function option.
1. A 5-axis configuration parameter selection command (M641/M642) was specified during 5-axis control.2. A value other than from 1 to 3 is set for K113 or K225.
An M code for canceling the disabled status of the automatic operation safety shield is specified at a position where synchronization for the interference check function of the automatic operation safety shield cannot be executed properly.
β
An attempt was made to execute a program although the engraving function option was not featured.
An engraving command was specified in the mode in which the engraving function cannot be executed.
The text string contains an arc whose diameter is smaller than a half of the character height or smaller than the character pitch.
No character height is specified.
During parallel axes composite control, an attempt was made to move the fundamental axis using a command other than G00/G01 while the position adjustment had not completed.
Hobbing (G114.3) was specified with parameter K259 bit 0 set to 1 (hobbing: axis configuration discrimination function enabled) and in any of the following statuses.The axis set for parameter BA54 (hobbing: workpiece axis) does not exist in the first control path.The axis set for parameter BA54 (hobbing: workpiece axis) is not a rotary axis.The axis set for parameter BA54 (hobbing: workpiece axis) does not match the axis set for either K121 (first rotary axis) or K125 (second rotary axis).Any of the axes set for K114, K115 and K116 does not exist in the first control path.
During the tool path check, the system in which the crossing command was set and/or the remote system for which the crossing command was to be executed has been set to the following status:1: The specified axis does not exist in the remote system.2: The local system is specified as the system for which the crossing command was to be executed.4: A crossing control command is set for the axis currently undergoing the crossing command.16: The G110 command is set when the local system/remote system is in the modal environment that does not allow crossing control.32: The crossing control command is set under the prohibited status of recalculation.
The number of axes in the remote system became zero during the tool path check when the crossing command was executed.
Loading an incorrect CAD file has been attempted.
Incorrect dimensions have been entered in the material database or there are sections in which dimensions are missing.
Incorrect dimensions have been entered in the fixture database or there are sections in which dimensions are missing.
Despite 9999 sets of data already existing, registering further data has been attempted.
Adding (copying) data has been attempted without selecting source data when editing the material database or the fixture database.
Changing data has been attempted without selecting source data when editing the material database or the fixture database.
Deleting data has been attempted without selecting source data when editing the material database or the fixture database.
Adding data to the material database has been attempted when an existing number was selected.
Adding data to the fixture database has been attempted when an existing number was selected.
Selecting the shape surface to be moved or disposed has been attempted during surface matching when a shape was not selected.
Adding (copying) data or deleting data has been attempted when no data was present in the material database or the fixture database.
The file name that has been entered during the name changing or copying process of model management is the same as the selected file name.
Too long a file name has been entered during the model saving, renaming, or copying process of material model management or fixture model management.
The model saving process of material model management or fixture model management has failed.
Displaying jaws has been attempted when the number of jaws was zero.
Parallel move surface matching, X-axis rotation surface matching, Y-axis rotation surface matching, or Z-axis rotation surface matching has been attempted when the shape to be moved or the surface of the shape to be moved was not selected.
Parallel move surface matching, X-axis rotation surface matching, Y-axis rotation surface matching, or Z-axis rotation surface matching has been attempted when the shape to be disposed or the surface of the shape to be disposed was not selected.
Parallel move surface matching, X-axis rotation surface matching, Y-axis rotation surface matching, or Z-axis rotation surface matching has been attempted when a surface other than a plane or cylindrical surface was selected.
Parallel move surface matching has been attempted when surfaces that are not parallel were selected.X-axis rotation surface matching, Y-axis rotation surface matching, or Z-axis rotation surface matching has been attempted when a surface perpendicular to the rotational axis was selected.
The parallel surfaces to be moved in parallel for surface matching do not exist.
Illegal characters or symbols are included in the file name.
A registered number has been designated during database registration.
The specified parametric model or CAD model is outside the workpiece information of the common unit.
The specified CAD model is outside the jaw shape based on the setup information.
It is not possible to manually dispose a material model that has been created from the workpiece information, or a fixture model that has been created from setup information.
β
The menu for the secondary spindle was tapped although the machine does not have the secondary spindle.
Material order change to an illegal position was attempted.
The calculation result of the combined material is illegal.The following shows the possible causes.The material is intricately separated into multiple pieces.Cavities will be generated inside the geometry.The material will vanish as the result of calculation.Models are in contact to each other (non-manifold geometry).The CAD model contains an illegal geometry.
An attempt was made to change the rotary axis of the table of a table whose rotary axis cannot be changed.
When a saved program was input to a machine that has a different axis configuration, an arrangement of material and fixture models that the axis configuration of the machine does not allow such a setup was detected.
Selection of feature points failed due to any of the following causes.There is no reference point. (reference point selection)No material/fixture geometry is arranged. (geometric feature point selection)Grids cannot be displayed. (grid selection)A type of feature point that cannot be selected is specified.
The setting target of feature point data is not selected.
Addition of a reference point failed due to any of the following causes.A reference point with the same name already exists.The coordinate value for the reference point is illegal.
Data input for grid display settings are illegal.
The following shows the possible causes for the workpiece offset write error.Feature points are not selected.The workpiece offset value to be written is illegal.The WRITE button was tapped without tapping the SET button.
A combination order change to an illegal position was attempted.
A menu item for plane selection was tapped with no selectable material/fixture geometry arranged.
A menu item for angle measurement was tapped with no rotary axis selected.
1. [WORKPCE CAD FILECONVERT] was tapped during operation.2. [WORKPCE CAD FILECONVERT] was tapped with parametric material set.
[SELECT WORKPIECE MATERIAL] or [LOCATE MANUALLY] for changing material settings was tapped during material model conversion.
Execution of the machining program results in the interference occurring between <Interfering section 1> and <Interfering section 2>.
Execution of the machining program results in <Interfering section 1> and <Interfering section 2> being present within the specified interference distance.
Execution of the machining program results in the interference occurring between <Interfering section 1> and <Interfering section 2>.
The entered data is incorrect.
Execution of Virtual Machining has been attempted during automatic operation of the NEXUS machine.
A Z-offset is not set in the program of Z-offset scheme.
Jaw No. is not set.
The restart position search function has been aborted.
The restarting point is not found.
1. Lack of available memory space2. Arithmetical incapability3. Entered data imperfections4. A program containing a chain from a MULTIPLEX program to a non-MULTIPLEX program has been checked in the solid mode.(Only for MULTIPLEX series)
1. Lack of available memory space2. Arithmetical incapability3. The machine model file is missing.
The shape cannot be created since the entered tool data is insufficient or incorrect.
The shape cannot be created since the entered machine parameters on the tailstock shape are incorrect.
The file "C:\ymw\M8\data\MC_Machine DataBase\lisp" is corrupted.
A machine model is not registered.
In spite of the setting for a material piece to be mounted on the machine table, it was attempted to selectively turn off the function of checking for interference with respect to the material piece.
A machining program is searched for, or selected, for which a material piece is arranged in a position where the function of checking for interference is currently specified as being cancelled for the material piece.
β
There is no material model conversion data.
The material model has been updated after conversion.
The external memory is write-protected.
A user failed to log on to another PC when storing data on it.
The folder specified as the destination folder is not found on the network.
The memory device is not inserted correctly.
The user does not have the authority to access the PC specified.
The file is not found or it is corrupted.
A communication error occurred between the NC and the PC.
An error occurred while machine data was being transferred.
Note :Sub error codes related to the storage of machine data300 to 399: Error in storing data on the destination device caused by lack of storage space400 to 499: Error in extracting or compressing machine data
An invalid drive is specified.
A user failed to write data on the destination device specified.
Some are missing from the files to be saved as CAM machine data.
β
The cutting power anticipated from the cutting conditions during tapping exceeds the threshold. Machining with these conditions may cause the cutting power to exceed the spindle capacity. (This alarm is only for warning and does not affect the program operation.)
β
Importing of an add-on option license has failed.
β
β
An attempt was made to change the trial mode setting while the trial mode was enabled.
TOOL EYE measurement was attempted on the TOOL OFFSET screen while TOOL EYE measurement initiated from the TOOL DATA screen was in progress.
TOOL EYE measurement was attempted on the TOOL DATA screen while TOOL EYE measurement initiated from the TOOL OFFSET screen was in progress.
A non-registered tool was found in the required tool list in the tooling mode.
When the project function was enabled (parameter US1 bit 5 = 1), the work number in other than the standard operation area was specified for WORK No. in the end unit of a MAZATROL program in the WORK No. SELECT window.
With opposed-spindle lathes (MULTIPLEX), the cursor sometimes fails to move to the correct restarting position in the smooth restart function when the program is stopped in a queuing state between systems in a composite program. Head No. Cause 1 Program stop while head 1 is in the queuing state 2 Program stop while head 2 is in the queuing state
No project has been selected or a project that does not exist has been specified.
The number of registered projects has exceeded the maximum number of projects that can be registered.
The specified project name already exists.
When reading a CAD model using the 3D ASSIST function, generation of a cross-section shape has failed.
An attempt was made to display QUICK EIA for a complicated machining shape. An attempt was made to analyze the program or NC commands for a completed machining shape.
Β© 2025 Alarm Intelligence Hub β’ Powered by cowie.ai
Independent third-party service β’ Not affiliated with any manufacturer